User menu

The perceived impact of publications on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses as measured by their impact factor

Bibliographic reference Vanderelst, Dieter ; Speybroeck, Sara ; Speybroeck, Niko. The perceived impact of publications on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses as measured by their impact factor. In: Scientometrics : an international journal for all quantitative aspects of the science of science, communication in science and science policy, Vol. 90, no.2, p. 331-342 (2011)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/132498
  1. Bakker P., Rigter H., Editors of medical journals: Who and from where, 10.1007/bf02020137
  2. Balasegaram, M., Balasegaram, S., Malvy, D., & Millet, P. (2008). Neglected diseases in the news: A content analysis of recent international media coverage focussing on leishmaniasis and trypanosomiasis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2(5), e234.
  3. Bosman Maarten, Mwinga Alwyn, Tropical diseases and the 10/90 gap, 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)92049-x
  4. Catling Jonathan C., Mason Victoria L., Upton Dominic, Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK, 10.1007/s11192-009-2124-1
  5. Chew M., Villanueva E. V, Van Der Weyden M. B, Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views, 10.1258/jrsm.100.3.142
  6. Chirac Pierre, Torreele Els, Global framework on essential health R&D, 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68672-8
  7. Engels Dirk, Savioli Lorenzo, Reconsidering the underestimated burden caused by neglected tropical diseases, 10.1016/j.pt.2006.06.004
  8. Falagas M. E., Pitsouni E. I., Malietzis G. A., Pappas G., Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses, 10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
  9. Frank, M. (2003). Impact factors: Arbiter of excellence? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 4.
  10. Gordon Michael D., How Authors Select Journals: A Test of the Reward Maximization Model of Submission Behaviour, 10.1177/030631284014001003
  11. Harzing AWK, van der Wal R, Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis, 10.3354/esep00076
  12. Horton Richard, Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty, 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12665-7
  13. Hotez Peter J., Molyneux David H., Fenwick Alan, Kumaresan Jacob, Sachs Sonia Ehrlich, Sachs Jeffrey D., Savioli Lorenzo, Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10.1056/nejmra064142
  14. Hotez, P., Molyneux, D., Fenwick, A., Ottesen, E., Sachs, S., & Sachs, J. (2007b). Incorporating a rapid-impact package for neglected tropical diseases with programs for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. PLoS Medicine, 3(5), 576.
  15. Hotez Peter J, Fenwick Alan, Savioli Lorenzo, Molyneux David H, Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases, 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60233-6
  16. Hunter Paul R, Bibliometrics, research quality, and neglected tropical diseases, 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60397-4
  17. KRELL Frank-Thorsten, Should editors influence journal impact factors?, 10.1087/20100110
  18. Luukkonen Terttu, Is scientists' publishing behaviour rewardseeking?, 10.1007/bf02017913
  19. Mathers Colin D., Ezzati Majid, Lopez Alan D., Measuring the Burden of Neglected Tropical Diseases: The Global Burden of Disease Framework, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000114
  20. Matias-Guiu, J., Garcia-Ramos, R. (2008). The impact factor and editorial decisions. Neurologia, 23(6), 342–348.
  21. Médecins Sans Frontières (2001). Fatal imbalance: The crisis in research and development for drugs for neglected diseases. Tech. Rep. Geneva, Switzerland: MS Frontires.
  22. Morel Carlos Medicis, Serruya Suzanne Jacob, Penna Gerson Oliveira, Guimarães Reinaldo, Co-authorship Network Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Strategic Planning of Research, Development and Capacity Building Programs on Neglected Diseases, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000501
  23. PRINGLE James, Trends in the use of ISI citation databases for evaluation, 10.1087/095315108x288901
  24. Pruss-Ustun, A., Mathers, C., Corvalan, C., & Woodward, A. (2003). The global burden of disease concept. Introduction and methods: Assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels (pp. 27–40). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
  25. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org . Accessed Nov 2010.
  26. REGAZZI John J., AYTAC Selenay, Author perceptions of journal quality, 10.1087/095315108x288938
  27. Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. (2003). Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal—Medical Library Association, 91, 42–46.
  28. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079):497. http://www.bmj.com/content/314/7079/497.1.short .
  29. Sumathipala Athula, Siribaddana Sisira, Patel Vikram, Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals, 10.1186/1472-6939-5-5
  30. US National Library of Medicine (2010). Medline pubmed xml element descriptions and their attributes. Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  31. Vanderelst Dieter, Speybroeck Niko, Quantifying the Lack of Scientific Interest in Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000576
  32. Venables W. N., Ripley B. D., Modern Applied Statistics with S, ISBN:9781441930088, 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  33. WHO (2010). Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: First who report on neglected tropical diseases. Tech. Rep. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
  34. WHO (2008). The global burden of disease: 2004 Update. http://www.who.int/evidence/bod . Accessed Nov 2010.
  35. WHO (2011). Neglected zoonotic diseases. http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/zoonoses/en/ . Accessed Nov 2010.
  36. Yamey G., The world's most neglected diseases, 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.176