User menu

Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint

Bibliographic reference Dennis, Roger L.H., ; Shreeve, Tim G. ; Van Dyck, Hans. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. In: Oikos, Vol. 102, p. 417-426 (2003)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/132308
  1. H. R. Akcakaya . 2001 . Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models . -Sci. Total Environ.274 : 283 -291 .
  2. R. R. Baker . 1969 . The evolution of the migratory habitat in butterflies . -J. Anim. Ecol.38 : 703 -746 .
  3. Baker R. R., The evolutionary ecology of animal migration (1978)
  4. Baker R. R., The biology of butterflies, 279 (1984)
  5. C. L. Boggs, and C. H. Ross . 1993 . The effects of adult food limitation on life history traits inSpeyeria mormonia(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) . -Evolution74 : 433 -441 .
  6. D. A. Boughton . 1999 . Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation . -Ecology80 : 2727 -2739 .
  7. P. M. Brakefield . 1982 . Ecological studies on the butterflyManiola jurtinain Britain. I. Adult behaviour, microdistribution and dispersal . -J. Anim. Ecol.51 : 713 -726 .
  8. Calow P., Blackwell's concise encyclopedia of ecology (1999)
  9. M. Clinchy, D. T. Haydon, and A. T. Smith . 2002 . Pattern does not equal process: what does patch occupancy really tell us about metapopulation dynamics? -Am. Nat.159 : 351 -362 .
  10. Collin P. H., Dictionary of ecology and the environment (1988)
  11. K. F. Conrad, I. P. Woiwod, and J. N. Perry . 2002 . Long term decline in abundance and distribution of the garden tiger moth (Arctia caja) in Great Britain . -Biol. Conserv.106 : 329 -337 .
  12. L. Conradt, E. J. Bodsworth, T. J. Roper, and C. D. Thomas . 2000 . Non-randon dispersal in the butterflyManiola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models . -Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.267 : 1505 -1510 .
  13. L. Conradt, T. J. Roper, and C. D Thomas . 2001 . Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies . -Oikos95 : 416 -424 .
  14. L. M. Cook, and V. Sarsam . 1981 . Polymorphism in the mothNoctua pronuba(L.) . -Heredity46 : 443 -447 .
  15. S. P. Courtney, and A. E. Duggan . 1983 . The population biology of the orange-tip butterflyAnthocharis cardaminesin Britain . -Ecol. Entomol.8 : 271 -281 .
  16. M. Delibes, P. Ferreras, and P. Gaona . 2001 . Attractive sinks, or how individual behaviour decisions determine source-sink dynamics . -Ecol. Lett.4 : 401 -403 .
  17. den Boer P. J., Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecology (1996)
  18. Dennis R. L. H., The British butterflies. Their origin and establishment (1977)
  19. Dennis R. L. H., The ecology of butterflies in Britain (1992)
  20. Dennis R. L. H., Butterflies and climate change (1993)
  21. R. L. H. Dennis, and P. Bardell . 1996 . The impact of extreme weather on Great Orme populations ofHipparchia semele(Linnaeus, 1758) andPlebejus argus(Linnaeus, 1758) (Papilionoidea: Satyrinae and Lycaenidae): hindsight, inference and lost opportunities . -Entomol. Gaz.47 : 211 -225 .
  22. R. L. H. Dennis, and H. T. Eales . 1997 . Patch occupancy inCoenonympha tullia(Lepidoptera: Satyridae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation . -J. Insect Conserv.1 : 167 -176 .
  23. R. L. H. Dennis, and H. T. Eales . 1999 . Probability of patch site occupancy inCoenonympha tullia(Muller) (Lepidoptera: Satryinae) determined from geographical and ecological data . -Biol. Conserv.87 : 295 -301 .
  24. Dennis R. L. H., Butterflies on British and Irish offshore islands (1996)
  25. P. Douwes . 1976 . Distribution of a population of the butterflyHeodes virgaureaeL. (Lycaeinidae) . -Oikos26 : 332 -340 .
  26. J. W. Dover . 1996 . Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland . -J. Appl. Ecol.33 : 723 -734 .
  27. J. W. Dover, T. H. Sparks, and J. N. Greatorex-Davies . 1997 . The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes . -J. Insect Conserv.1 : 89 -97 .
  28. J. Dover, T. Sparks, and S. Clarke . 2000 . Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes . -Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.80 : 227 -242 .
  29. J. B. Dunning, B. J. Danielson, and H. R. Pulliam . 1992 . Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes . -Oikos65 : 169 -175 .
  30. Elton C. S., The pattern of animal communities (1966)
  31. ERHARDT A., THOMAS J.A., Lepidoptera as Indicators of Change in the Semi-natural Grasslands of Lowland and Upland Europe, The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats (1991) ISBN:9780121813703 p.213-236, 10.1016/b978-0-12-181370-3.50015-4
  32. E. Fleishman, C. Ray, and P. Sjogren-Gulve . 2002 . Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics . -Conserv. Biol.16 : 706 -716 .
  33. Forman R. T. T., Landscape ecology (1986)
  34. R. P Freckleton, and A. R. Watkinson . 2002 . Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations . -J. Ecol.90 : 419 -434 .
  35. Fry G., Ecology and integrated farming systems, 177 (1995)
  36. J. P. Grime . 1974 . Vegetation classification by reference to strategies . -Nature250 : 26 -31 .
  37. D. Gutierrez, C. D. Thomas, and J. L. Leon-Cortes . 1999 . Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamcis of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages) . -Oecologia121 : 506 -517 .
  38. D. Gutierrez, J. L. Leon-Cortes, and R. Menendez . 2001 . Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant,Lotus corniculatus. -Ecology82 : 1371 -1386 .
  39. L. S. Hall, P. R. Krausman, and M. L. Morrison . 1997 . The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology . -Wildlife Soc. Bull.25 : 173 -182 .
  40. I. Hanski . 2001 . Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology . -Naturwissenschaften88 : 372 -381 .
  41. Hanski I. A., Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution (1997)
  42. I. Hanski, and M. C. Singer . 2001 . Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations . -Am. Nat.158 : 341 -353 .
  43. P. B. Hardy, and R. L. H. Dennis . 1999 . The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region . -Biodiv. Conserv.8 : 1261 -1279 .
  44. Harrison Susan, Taylor Andrew D., Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics, Metapopulation Biology (1997) ISBN:9780123234452 p.27-42, 10.1016/b978-012323445-2/50004-3
  45. J. R. Haslett . 1990 . Geographic information systems: a new approach to habitat definition and the study of distributions . -Trends Ecol. Evol.5 : 214 -218 .
  46. M. Heino, and I. Hanski . 2001 . Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model . -Am. Nat.157 : 495 -511 .
  47. J. K. Hill, C. D. Thomas, and O. T. Lewis . 1996 . Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal byHesperia commabutterflies: implications for metapopulation structure . -J. Anim. Ecol.65 : 725 -735 .
  48. A. W. King, and K. A. With . 2002 . Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behaviour really matter? -Ecol. Model.147 : 23 -39 .
  49. A. G. Kluge . 1990 . Species as historical individuals . -Biol. Philos.5 : 417 -431 .
  50. Lincoln R. J., A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics (1982)
  51. Longley P. A., Geographic information systems and science (2001)
  52. M. Luoto, M. Kuussaari, and H. Rita . 2001 . Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach . -Ecography24 : 601 -617 .
  53. A. Moilanen . 2002 . Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application . -Oikos96 : 516 -530 .
  54. T. R. New . 1997 . Are Lepidoptera an effective 'umbrella group' for biodiversity conservation? -J. Insect Conserv.1 : 5 -12 .
  55. Odum E. P., Ecology (1963)
  56. P. Opdam, R. Foppen, and C. Vos . 2001 . Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology . -Landscape Ecol.16 : 767 -779 .
  57. M. A. Peterson . 1997 . Host plant phenology and butterfly dispersal: causes and consequences of uphill movement . -Ecology78 : 167 -180 .
  58. T. H. Ricketts . 2001 . The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes . -Am. Nat.158 : 87 -99 .
  59. Rodwell J. S., et seq. British plant communities, Vols, 1-5 (1991)
  60. J. Roland, N. Keyghobadi, and S. Fownes . 2000 . AlpineParnassiusbutterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size . -Ecology81 : 1642 -1653 .
  61. Rosenzweig Michael L., Species diversity in space and time, ISBN:9780511623387, 10.1017/cbo9780511623387
  62. C. L. Shafer . 2001 . Inter-reserve distance . -Biol. Conserv.100 : 215 -227 .
  63. T. G. Shreeve, R. L. H. Dennis, and W. R. Williams . 1996 . Uniformity of wing spotting ofManiola jurtina(L.) (Lep., Satyrinae) in relation to environmental heterogeneity . -Nota Lepidopterologica18 : 77 -92 .
  64. T. G. Shreeve, R. L. H. Dennis, and A. S. Pullin . 1996 . How marginal is the British butterfly fauna and what are the implications for research opportunities and conservation? -Biodiv. Conserv.5 : 1131 -1141 .
  65. T. G. Shreeve, R. L. H. Dennis, D. B. Roy, and D. Moss . 2001 . An ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancy . -J. Insect Conserv.5 : 145 -161 .
  66. M. C. Singer . 1972 . Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony . -Science176 : 75 -77 .
  67. T. R. E. Southwood . 1962 . Migration of terrestrial arthopods in relation to habitat . -Biol. Rev.37 : 171 -214 .
  68. T. R. E. Southwood . 1977 . Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies . -J. Anim. Ecol.46 : 337 -365 .
  69. T. R. E. Southwood . 1988 . Tactics, strategies and templets . -Oikos52 : 3 -18 .
  70. Sparks T. H., Landscape ecology: theory and application, 24 (1995)
  71. O. L. Sutcliffe, C. D. Thomas, and D. Peggie . 1997 . Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes . -Oecologia109 : 229 -234 .
  72. P. D. Taylor, L. Fahrig, K. Henein, and G. Merriam . 1993 . Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure . -Oikos68 : 571 -573 .
  73. C. D. Thomas, E. J. Bodsworth, and R. J. Wilson . 2001 . Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins . -Nature411 : 577 -581 .
  74. C. D. Thomas, and S. Harrison . 1992 . Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species . -J. Anim. Ecol.61 : 437 -446 .
  75. C. D Thomas, and W. E. Kunin . 1999 . The spatial structure of populations . -J. Anim. Ecol.68 : 647 -657 .
  76. C. D. Thomas, M. S. Warren, and J. A. Thomas . 1992 . Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes . -Oecologia92 : 563 -567 .
  77. C. D. Thomas, R. J. Wilson, and O. T. Lewis . 2002 . Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation . -Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.269 : 563 -569 .
  78. Thomas J. A., The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation, 149 (1991)
  79. J. A. Thomas . 1993 . Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early-successional habitats . -Ecography16 : 278 -284 .
  80. J. A. Thomas . 1994 . Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapes . -Ibis137 : 112 -119 .
  81. J. A. Thomas, N. A. D. Bourn, and R. T. Clarke . 2001 . The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes . -Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.268 : 1791 -1796 .
  82. J. A. Thomas, R. J. Rose, and R. T. Clarke . 1999 . Interspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range . -Funct. Ecol.13 : 55 -64 .
  83. C. Topping, and J. U. Jepsen . 2002 . Simulation models of animal behaviour are useful tools in landscape and species management . -IALE Bulletin20 : 1 -2 .
  84. M. G. Turner . 1989 . Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process . -Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.20 : 171 -197 .
  85. J. Vandermeer, and R. Carvajal . 2001 . Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix . -Am. Nat.158 : 211 -220 .
  86. van Swaay C., Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment, No. 99. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (1999)
  87. N. Wahlberg, T. Klemetti, and I. Hanski . 2002 . Dynamic populationns in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly . -Ecography25 : 224 -232 .
  88. M. S. Warren . 1994 . The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillaryEurodryas aurinia. -Biol. Conserv.67 : 239 -249 .
  89. Weddell Bertie Josephson, Conserving Living Natural Resources : In the context of a changing world, ISBN:9780511804298, 10.1017/cbo9780511804298
  90. R. H. Whittaker, S. A. Levin, and R. B. Root . 1973 . Niche, habitat, and ecotope . -Am. Nat.107 : 321 -338 .
  91. Wiens J. A., Metapopulations and wildlife conservation, 53 (1996)
  92. Wiens John A., Metapopulation Dynamics and Landscape Ecology, Metapopulation Biology (1997) ISBN:9780123234452 p.43-62, 10.1016/b978-012323445-2/50005-5
  93. C. Wiklund . 1977 . Oviposition, feeding and spatial separation of breeding and foraging habitats in a population ofLeptidea sinapis(Lepidoptera) . -Oikos28 : 56 -68 .
  94. R. J. Wilson, S. M. Ellis, and J. S. Baker . Metapopulations of metapopulations near the range margins of Aricia butterfly species . -Ecology0 .