User menu

Rationing in the presence of baselines

Bibliographic reference Hougaard, Jens Leth Hougaard ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan de Dios ; Osterdal, Lars Peter. Rationing in the presence of baselines. In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 40, no.4, p. 1047-1066 (2013)
Permanent URL
  1. Aumann Robert J, Maschler Michael, Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud, 10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4
  2. Chun Youngsub, Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems, 10.1007/s001820050122
  3. Chun Y, Schummer J, Thomson W (2001) Constrained egalitarianism: a new solution for claims problems. Seoul J Econ 14: 269–297
  4. Dagan Nir, New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules, 10.1007/bf00179098
  5. Fleurbaey Marc, Roemer John E., Judicial precedent as a dynamic rationale for axiomatic bargaining theory : Judicial precedent as a dynamic rationale, 10.3982/te588
  6. Gupta Sunil, Livne Zvi A., Resolving a Conflict Situation with a Reference Outcome: An Axiomatic Model, 10.1287/mnsc.34.11.1303
  7. Hokari Toru, Thomson William, On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency, 10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.01.001
  8. Hougaard Jens Leth, Moreno-Ternero Juan D., Østerdal Lars Peter, A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims, 10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.01.004
  9. Ju Biung-Ghi, Moreno-Ternero Juan D., Progressive and merging-proof taxation, 10.1007/s00182-010-0228-8
  10. Kaminski Marek M., Parametric rationing methods, 10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.013
  11. Moreno-Ternero Juan D, Roemer John E, Impartiality, Priority, and Solidarity in the Theory of Justice, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00710.x
  12. Moreno-Ternero Juan D., Villar Antonio, The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards, 10.1016/s0165-4896(03)00087-8
  13. Moreno-Ternero Juan D., Villar Antonio, The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems, 10.1007/s00355-006-0121-3
  14. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2006b) New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule. Rev Econ Des 10: 73–84
  15. Moulin Herve, Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods, 10.1111/1468-0262.00126
  16. Moulin Hervé, Chapter 6 Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare (2002) ISBN:9780444829146 p.289-357, 10.1016/s1574-0110(02)80010-8
  17. O'Neill Barry, A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud, 10.1016/0165-4896(82)90029-4
  18. Pulido Manuel, Sánchez-Soriano Joaquín, Llorca Natividad, 10.1023/a:1016395917734
  19. Pulido M., Borm P., Hendrickx R., Llorca N., Sánchez-Soriano J., Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references, 10.1007/s10479-007-0241-x
  20. Roemer John E., Equality of Resources Implies Equality of Welfare, 10.2307/1884177
  21. Thomson William, The Fair Division of a Fixed Supply Among a Growing Population, 10.1287/moor.8.3.319
  22. Thomson William, Problems of fair division and the Egalitarian solution, 10.1016/0022-0531(83)90074-1
  23. Thomson W (1994) Cooperative models of bargaining. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) The handbook of game theory, chap 35, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam
  24. Thomson William, Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey, 10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00070-7
  25. Thomson W (2006) How to divide when there isn’t enough: from the Talmud to game theory, Manuscript, University of Rochester
  26. Thomson W (2007) Consistent allocation rules, Book Manuscript, University of Rochester
  27. Thomson William, Yeh Chun-Hsien, Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims, 10.1016/j.jet.2007.12.005
  28. van den Brink R, Funaki Y, van der Laan G (2008) The Reverse Talmud Rule for bankruptcy problems. Tinbergen Discussion Paper 08/026-1, Amsterdam