Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain
Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. "Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis" [Pain 2009;141:215-221], and on Rollman "Perspectives on hypervigilance" [Pain 2009;141:183-184].
Primary tabs
| Document type | Article de périodique (Journal article) |
|---|---|
| Access type | Accès restreint |
| Publication date | 2009 |
| Language | Anglais |
| Journal information | "Pain" - Vol. 144, no. 3, p. 342-3; author reply 343-4 (2009) |
| Peer reviewed | yes |
| issn | 0304-3959 |
| Publication status | Publié |
| Affiliation | UCL - PSP/PSP - Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation |
| MESH Subject | Affect ; Pain Threshold ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensory Thresholds ; Touch Perception ; Arousal ; Auditory Perception ; Humans ; Hyperacusis ; Hyperalgesia ; Models, Neurological ; Pain ; Pain Measurement |
| Links |
| Bibliographic reference | Van Damme, Stefaan ; Crombez, Geert ; Wiech, Katja ; Legrain, Valéry ; Peters, Madelon L ; et. al. Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. "Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis" [Pain 2009;141:215-221], and on Rollman "Perspectives on hypervigilance" [Pain 2009;141:183-184].. In: Pain, Vol. 144, no. 3, p. 342-3; author reply 343-4 (2009) |
|---|---|
| Permanent URL | http://hdl.handle.net/2078/125422 |