User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain | Saint-Louis

Is There an Ideal REDD+ Program? An Analysis of Policy Trade-Offs at the Local Level

  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 546.43 K
  1. Angelsen A, editor (2009) Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  2. Springate-Baginski O, Wollenberg E, editors (2010) REDD, forest governance and rural livelihoods: the emerging agenda. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  3. Bond I, Grieg-Gran M, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Hazlewood P, Wunder S, et al. (2009) Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: a review and lessons for REDD. Natural Resource Issues No. 16. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, and World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
  4. Jack B. K., Kousky C., Sims K. R. E., Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms, 10.1073/pnas.0705503104
  5. Jagger P, Sills EO, Lawlor K, Sunderlin WD (2010) A guide to learning about livelihood impact of REDD+ projects. Occasional paper 56. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  6. Pagiola Stefano, Arcenas Agustin, Platais Gunars, Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
  7. Wunder Sven, Engel Stefanie, Pagiola Stefano, Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
  8. Engel Stefanie, Pagiola Stefano, Wunder Sven, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
  9. Dyer G. A., Boucher S., Taylor J. E., Subsistence Response to Market Shocks, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00858.x
  10. Kindermann G., Obersteiner M., Sohngen B., Sathaye J., Andrasko K., Rametsteiner E., Schlamadinger B., Wunder S., Beach R., Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation, 10.1073/pnas.0710616105
  11. Busch Jonah, Strassburg Bernardo, Cattaneo Andrea, Lubowski Ruben, Bruner Aaron, Rice Richard, Creed Anna, Ashton Ralph, Boltz Frederick, Comparing climate and cost impacts of reference levels for reducing emissions from deforestation, 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044006
  12. Strassburg Bernardo, Turner R. Kerry, Fisher Brendan, Schaeffer Roberto, Lovett Andrew, Reducing emissions from deforestation—The “combined incentives” mechanism and empirical simulations, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.004
  13. Soares-Filho B., Moutinho P., Nepstad D., Anderson A., Rodrigues H., Garcia R., Dietzsch L., Merry F., Bowman M., Hissa L., Silvestrini R., Maretti C., Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation, 10.1073/pnas.0913048107
  14. Busch J., Lubowski R. N., Godoy F., Steininger M., Yusuf A. A., Austin K., Hewson J., Juhn D., Farid M., Boltz F., Structuring economic incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation within Indonesia, 10.1073/pnas.1109034109
  15. Matthews Robin, Dyer George, Evaluating the impacts of REDD+ at subnational scales: are our frameworks and models good enough?, 10.4155/cmt.11.52
  16. ZILBERMAN DAVID, LIPPER LESLIE, MCCARTHY NANCY, When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor?, 10.1017/s1355770x08004294
  17. BULTE ERWIN H., LIPPER LESLIE, STRINGER RANDY, ZILBERMAN DAVID, Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives, 10.1017/s1355770x08004348
  18. Ghazoul Jaboury, Butler Rhett A., Mateo-Vega Javier, Koh Lian Pin, REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications, 10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.005
  19. Seymour F, Angelsen A (2009) Summary and conclusions: REDD wine in old wineskins? In: Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. In: Angelsen A, editor. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  20. Bell RG, Callan D (2011) More than meets the eye: The social cost of carbon in U.S. climate policy in plain English. World Resources Institute, Policy Brief.
  21. Angelsen A, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S (2008) What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options? In: Angelsen A, editor. Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  22. de Janvry Alain, Fafchamps Marcel, Sadoulet Elisabeth, Peasant Household Behaviour with Missing Markets: Some Paradoxes Explained, 10.2307/2234892
  23. Key Nigel, Sadoulet Elisabeth, de Janvry Alain, Transactions Costs and Agricultural Household Supply Response, 10.1111/0002-9092.00022
  24. Chazdon R. L., Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded Lands, 10.1126/science.1155365
  25. Lamb D., Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forest Landscapes, 10.1126/science.1111773
  26. Meyfroidt Patrick, Lambin Eric F., Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation, 10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732
  27. Sloan Sean, Pelletier Johanne, How accurately may we project tropical forest-cover change? A validation of a forward-looking baseline for REDD, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.001
  28. Wünscher Tobias, Engel Stefanie, Wunder Sven, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014
  29. Grieg-Gran Maryanne, Porras Ina, Wunder Sven, How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002
  30. SOUTHGATE DOUGLAS, HAAB TIMOTHY, LUNDINE JOHN, RODRÍGUEZ FABIÁN, Payments for environmental services and rural livelihood strategies in Ecuador and Guatemala, 10.1017/s1355770x09005361
  31. Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J (1986) The basic model: Theory, empirical results, and policy conclusions. In: Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J, editors. Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications, and policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.
  32. Appendini K (2010) La regularización de la tierra después de 1992. In: Yúnez A, editor. Los grandes problemas de México. XI. Economía Rural. El Colegio de México, Mexico.
  33. Dyer G (2008) Implicaciones de los cambios en el precio internacional del maíz sobre el uso del suelo en México. IDBDOCS#1774958-v1-ME-T1014. InterAmerican Development Bank, Washington.
  34. Dyer G. A., Crop valuation and farmer response to change: implications for in situ conservation of maize in Mexico., Valuing crop biodiversity: on-farm genetic resources and economic change ISBN:9780851990835 p.17-31, 10.1079/9780851990835.0017
  35. Sadoulet Elisabeth, Janvry Alain de, Davis Benjamin, Cash Transfer Programs with Income Multipliers: PROCAMPO in Mexico, 10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00018-3
  36. GROOM BEN, PALMER CHARLES, Cost-effective provision of environmental services: the role of relaxing market constraints, 10.1017/s1355770x09990167
  37. CHOMITZ KENNETH M., ALGER KEITH, THOMAS TIMOTHY S., ORLANDO HELOISA, NOVA PAULO VILA, Opportunity costs of conservation in a biodiversity hotspot: the case of southern Bahia , 10.1017/s1355770x05002081
  38. Alix-Garcia J. M., Shapiro E. N., Sims K. R. E., Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico's National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program, 10.3368/le.88.4.613
  39. Muñoz-Piña Carlos, Guevara Alejandro, Torres Juan Manuel, Braña Josefina, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
  40. Taylor J.Edward, Yúnez-Naude Antonio, Hampton Steve, Agricultural Policy Reforms and Village Economies, 10.1016/s0161-8938(97)00069-0
Bibliographic reference Dyer, George A. ; Matthews, Robin ; Meyfroidt, Patrick. Is There an Ideal REDD+ Program? An Analysis of Policy Trade-Offs at the Local Level. In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, no. 12, p. e52478 (2012)
Permanent URL