User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.

Primary tabs

Olszewski, Raphaël [UCL] Frison, L Wisniewski, M Denis , J M [UCL] Vynckier , S [UCL] Cosnard, Guy [UCL] Zech, Francis [UCL] Reychler, Hervé [UCL]

Cone-beam CT should be preferred over low-dose CT for developing three-dimensional bony cephalometric analyses.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2013
Language Anglais
Journal information "Clinical Oral Investigations" - Vol. 17, no. 1, p. 285-92 (2013)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer ((Germany) Heidelberg)
issn 1432-6981
e-issn 1436-3771
Publication status Publié
Affiliations UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience
UCL - (SLuc) Service de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale
UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiothérapie oncologique
UCL - (SLuc) Département d'imagerie médicale
UCL - (SLuc) Département de médecine interne et services associés
UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation
UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiologie
Keywords Cone-beam computed thomography ; Three-dimensional imaging ; Cephalometry ; Dosimetry ; Maxillofacial
Links
  1. Grayson Barry, Cutting Court, Bookstein Fred L., Kim Hiechun, McCarthy Joseph G., The three-dimensional cephalogram: Theory, techniques, and clinical application, 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90058-3
  2. Adams Gregory L., Gansky Stuart A., Miller Arthur J., Harrell William E., Hatcher David C., Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.023
  3. Swennen Gwen R.J., Schutyser Filip, Barth Enno-Ludwig, De Groeve Pieter, De Mey Albert, A New Method of 3-D Cephalometry Part I : The Anatomic Cartesian 3-D Reference System, 10.1097/00001665-200603000-00019
  4. Richtsmeier Joan T., Paik Chul H., Elfert Peter C., Cole Theodore M., Dahlman Holly R., Precision, Repeatability, and Validation of the Localization of Cranial Landmarks Using Computed Tomography Scans, 10.1597/1545-1569(1995)032<0217:pravot>2.3.co;2
  5. Donatsky O., Hillerup S., Bjørn-Jørgensen J., Jacobsen P.U., Computerized cephalometric orthognathic surgical simulation, prediction and postoperative evaluation of precision, 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80218-8
  6. Cavalcanti Marcelo G.P, Haller John W, Vannier Michael W, Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: Experimental validation in vitro, 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90434-2
  7. Cavalcanti MGP, Rocha SS, Vannier MW, Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications, 10.1259/dmfr/13603271
  8. Farkas Leslie G, Katic Marko J, Forrest Christopher R, International Anthropometric Study of Facial Morphology in Various Ethnic Groups/Races : , 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e
  9. Delaire J., Schendel S.A., Tulasne J.-F., An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: A new lateral cephalometric analysis, 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90252-8
  10. Olszewski R., Zech F., Cosnard G., Nicolas V., Macq B., Reychler H., Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro, 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.022
  11. Olszewski R, Reychler H, Cosnard G, Denis J M, Vynckier S, Zech F, Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph, 10.1259/dmfr/33343444
  12. Connor SEJ, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, O'Gorman R, Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks, 10.1259/dmfr/90016954
  13. De Vos W., Casselman J., Swennen G.R.J., Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature, 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028
  14. Olszewski Raphael, Tanesy Olivier, Cosnard Guy, Zech Francis, Reychler Hervé, Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses, 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.005
  15. Lorensen William E., Cline Harvey E., Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm, 10.1145/37402.37422
  16. McCullagh Peter, Quasi-Likelihood Functions, 10.1214/aos/1176346056
  17. Chaganty N.Rao, Shults Justine, On eliminating the asymptotic bias in the quasi-least squares estimate of the correlation parameter, 10.1016/s0378-3758(98)00180-3
  18. Morel J.G., Bokossa M.C., Neerchal N.K., Small Sample Correction for the Variance of GEE Estimators, 10.1002/bimj.200390021
  19. Larzelere Robert E., Mulaik Stanley A., Single-sample tests for many correlations., 10.1037/0033-2909.84.3.557
  20. Van Cauter S., Okkerse W., Brijs G., De Beule M., Braem M., Verhegghe B., A new method for improved standardisation in three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometry, 10.1080/10255840903014967
  21. Enlow DH (1975) Handbook of facial growth. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
  22. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit, 10.1259/dmfr/26310390
  23. van Vlijmen Olivier J. C., Maal Thomas J. J., Bergé Stefaan J., Bronkhorst Ewald M., Katsaros Christos, Kuijpers-Jagtman Anne Marie, A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00633.x
  24. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G, Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography, 10.1259/dmfr/28403350
  25. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB, Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT, 10.1259/dmfr/14340323
  26. Van Vlijmen OJC, Rangel FA, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2010) Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-80
  27. Boetticher H, Lachmund J, Looe H, Hoffmann W, Poppe B, 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP Change Basis for Estimation of the Effective Dose: What is the Impact on Radiation Dose Assessment of Patient and Personnel?, 10.1055/s-2008-1027284
  28. Mah James K., Huang John C., Choo HyeRan, Practical Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics, 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0361
  29. Cevidanes Lucia, Baccetti Tiziano, Franchi Lorenzo, McNamara James A., De Clerck Hugo, Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion, 10.2319/111709-651.1
  30. Cevidanes Lucia H.C., Heymann Gavin, Cornelis Marie A., DeClerck Hugo J., Tulloch J.F. Camilla, Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018
  31. Garib DG, Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO, da Silva Filho OG (2011) Alveolar bone morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate in the mixed dentition: CBCT evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (in press)
Bibliographic reference Olszewski, Raphaël ; Frison, L ; Wisniewski, M ; Denis , J M ; Vynckier , S ; et. al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.. In: Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 17, no. 1, p. 285-92 (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/120477