User menu

Proportionality under Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Clarifying their Relationship

Bibliographic reference Van Steenberghe, Raphael. Proportionality under Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Clarifying their Relationship. In: Israel Law Review, Vol. 45, no. 1, p. 107-124 (2012)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/119788
  1. Kolb, Ius in bello: Le droit international des conflits armés, 36 (2009)
  2. Meyrowitz, Le principe de l'égalité des belligérants devant le droit de la guerre (1970)
  3. Sassòli, How Does Law Protect in War (2011)
  4. Sassòli, International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines. Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein (2007)
  5. David, Principes de droit des conflits armés (2008)
  6. Roberts Adam, The equal application of the laws of war: a principle under pressure, 10.1017/s1816383109000162
  7. Giladi Rotem, The Jus Ad Bellum/Jus In Bello Distinction and the Law of Occupation, 10.1017/s0021223700000236
  8. Moussa Jasmine, Can jus ad bellum override jus in bello? Reaffirming the separation of the two bodies of law, 10.1017/s181638310900023x
  9. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 35 (2004)
  10. Orakhelashvili A., Overlap and Convergence: The Interaction Between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, 10.1093/jcsl/krm010
  11. Sharma, Jus Post Bellum: Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace (2008)
  12. Chinkin Christine M., Kosovo: A "Good" or "Bad" War?, 10.2307/2555349
  13. Charney, American Journal of International Law, 93 (1999)
  14. Simma, The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (1994)
  15. Henckaerts Jean-Marie, Doswald-Beck Louise, Alvermann Carolin, Dormann Knut, Rolle Baptiste, Customary International Humanitarian Law, ISBN:9780511804700, 10.1017/cbo9780511804700
  16. Gardam Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, ISBN:9780511494178, 10.1017/cbo9780511494178
  17. Greenwood, The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (2008)
  18. Schindler, The Laws of Armed Conflicts (1988)
  19. Meyrowitz Henri, The principle of superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering: From the Declaration of St. Petersburg of 1868 to Additional Protocol 1 of 1977, 10.1017/s002086040007830x
  20. Brown, Cornell International Law Journal, 10 (1976)
  21. Cannizzaro Enzo, Contextualizing proportionality: jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the Lebanese war, 10.1017/s1816383107000896
  22. de Hemptinne, Droit International Humanitaire (2012)
  23. Österdahl, Nordic Journal of International Law, 78 (2010)
  24. Greenwood, International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (1989)
  25. Kolb, Réflexions de philosophie du droit international. Problèmes fondamentaux du droit international public: Théorie et philosophie du droit international (2003)
  26. VAN STEENBERGHE RAPHAËL, Self-Defence in Response to Attacks by Non-state Actors in the Light of Recent State Practice: A Step Forward?, 10.1017/s0922156509990380
  27. Corten, The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (2010)
  28. Wilmshurst E., The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence, 10.1093/iclq/lei137
  29. Akande, British Yearbook of International Law, 68 (1997)
  30. Steenberghe, La légitime défense en droit international public: Statut, contenu et preuve, 273 (2012)
  31. Meron, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000)
  32. Gardam, Australian Yearbook of International Law, 20 (1999)
  33. Pictet, Commentary on the Geneva Convention I (1952)
  34. Lanfranchi, La licéité de l'emploi d'armes nucléaires devant la Cour Internationale de Justice (1997)