User menu

MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.

Bibliographic reference Gerber, Bernhard. MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.. In: Current cardiology reports, Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 72-8 (2007)
Permanent URL
  1. Ohnesorge Bernd, Flohr Thomas, Becker Christoph, Kopp Andreas F., Schoepf Uwe J., Baum Ullrich, Knez Andreas, Klingenbeck-Regn Klaus, Reiser Maximilian F., Cardiac Imaging by Means of Electrocardiographically Gated Multisection Spiral CT: Initial Experience, 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv30564
  2. Bogaert J, Kuzo R, Dymarkowski S, et al.: Coronary artery imaging with real-time navigator three-dimensional turbofield-echo MR coronary angiography: initial experience. Radiology 2003, 226:707–716.
  3. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, et al.: Double-oblique free-breathing high resolution three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 34:524–531.
  4. Weber OM, Martin AJ, Higgins CB: Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2003, 50:1223–1228.
  5. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al.: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:147–154.
  6. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:552–557.
  7. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:575–582.
  8. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al.: High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005, 112:2318–2323.
  9. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al.: Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:1482–1487.
  10. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Suzawa N, et al.: Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. Radiology 2005, 237:316–321.
  11. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Nehrke K, et al.: Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:2313–2319.
  12. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al.: Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection—initial results. Radiology 2005, 234:98–108.
  13. Kefer J, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al.: Head to head comparison of multislice coronary CT and 3D navigator MRI for the detection of coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:92–100.
  14. Nagel E., Lehmkuhl H. B., Bocksch W., Klein C., Vogel U., Frantz E., Ellmer A., Dreysse S., Fleck E., Noninvasive Diagnosis of Ischemia-Induced Wall Motion Abnormalities With the Use of High-Dose Dobutamine Stress MRI : Comparison With Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography, 10.1161/01.cir.99.6.763
  15. Kuijpers D, Ho KY, van Dijkman PR, et al.: Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation 2003, 107:1592–1597.
  16. Kuijpers Dirkjan, Janssen Caroline H. C., van Dijkman Paul R. M., Oudkerk Matthijs, Dobutamine stress MRI. Part I. Safety and feasibility of dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients suspected of myocardial ischemia, 10.1007/s00330-004-2425-y
  17. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Gollesch A, et al.: Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J 2004, 25:1230–1236.
  18. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al.: Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004, 25:1657–1665.
  19. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al.: Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004, 110:732–737.
  20. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al.: Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004, 110:835–842.
  21. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al.: Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:153–160.
  22. Lima J. A. C., Judd R. M., Bazille A., Schulman S. P., Atalar E., Zerhouni E. A., Regional Heterogeneity of Human Myocardial Infarcts Demonstrated by Contrast-Enhanced MRI : Potential Mechanisms, 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1117
  23. Rochitte C. E., Lima J. A. C., Bluemke D. A., Reeder S. B., McVeigh E. R., Furuta T., Becker L. C., Melin J. A., Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial Infarction, 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.1006
  24. Kim R. J., Fieno D. S., Parrish T. B., Harris K., Chen E.-L., Simonetti O., Bundy J., Finn J. P., Klocke F. J., Judd R. M., Relationship of MRI Delayed Contrast Enhancement to Irreversible Injury, Infarct Age, and Contractile Function, 10.1161/01.cir.100.19.1992
  25. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al.: Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2005, 15:714–720.
  26. Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al.: Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography. Comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:1424–1433.
  27. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al.: Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006, 113:823–833.
  28. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, et al.: Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 2006, 113:394–404.
  29. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al.: Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:2042–2047.
  30. Fuster V, Fayad ZA, Moreno PR, et al.: Atherothrombosis and high-risk plaque: Part II: approaches by noninvasive computed tomographic/magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1209–1218.
  31. Wilensky RL, Song HK, Ferrari VA: Role of magnetic resonance and intravascular magnetic resonance in the detection of vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(8 Suppl):C48–C56.
  32. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al.: Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:672–677.
  33. Sirol M, Itskovich VV, Mani V, et al.: Lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques detected by gadofluorine-enhanced in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004, 109:2890–2896.
  34. Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, et al.: Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003, 107:2453–2458.
  35. Frias JC, Williams KJ, Fisher EA, Fayad ZA: Recombinant HDL-like nanoparticles: a specific contrast agent for MRI of atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126:16316–16317.
  36. Sommer T, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, et al.: Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology 2005, 234:718–725.
  37. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al.: Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1863–1869.