User menu

How does starvation affect spatial organization within nests in Lasius niger ?

Bibliographic reference Mailleux, Anne-Catherine ; Sempo, Grégory ; Depickère, Stéphanie ; Derain, Claire ; Deneubourg, Jean-Louis . How does starvation affect spatial organization within nests in Lasius niger ?. In: Insectes Sociaux, Vol. 58, no. 2, p. 219-225 (2011)
Permanent URL
  1. Anderson C. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 1999. Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queuing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am. Nat. 154: 521–535
  2. de Biseau J.C. 1994. Mécanismes et valeurs adaptative du recrutement alimentaire chez Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Approche expérimentale et théorique. Doctoral Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, pp 188
  3. de Biseau J.C. and Pasteels J.M. 2000. Response thresholds to recruitment signals and the regulation of foraging intensity in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav. Proc. 48: 137–148
  4. Depickère S., Fresneau D. and Deneubourg J.L. 2004. Dynamics of aggregation in Lasius niger (Formicidae): influence of polyethism. Insect. Soc. 51: 81–90
  5. Depickère S., Fresneau D. and Deneubourg J.L. 2008a. Effect of social and environmental factors on ant aggregation: A general response? J. Insect Physiol. 54: 1349–1355
  6. Depickère S., Fresneau D., Deneubourg J.L. and Detrain C. 2008b. Spatial organization in ants’ nests: does starvation modify the aggregative behaviour of Lasius niger species? Insect. Soc. 55: 163–170
  7. Franks N.R., Bryant S., Griffiths R. and Hemerik L. 1990. Synchronization of the behaviour within nests of the ant Leptothorax acervorum (Fabricius). I. Discovering the phenomenon and its relation to the level of deprivation. Bull. Math. Biol. 52: 597–612
  8. Fresneau D. and Corbara B. 1990. Spatial organization in the nest during colony ontogeny in the Ponerine ant Pachycondyla (Neoponera) apicalis. In: Social Insects in the Environment (G.K. Veeresh, B. Mallik and C.A. Viraktamath, Eds), Oxford and IBH Publ. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp 387
  9. Hangartner W. 1969. Structure and variability of the individual odor trail in Solenopsis geminata. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 62: 111–120
  10. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge, Massachussets: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 732 pp
  11. Josens R.B. and Roces F. 2000. Foraging in the ant Camponotus mus: nectar-intake and crop filling depend on colony deprivation. J. Insect Physiol. 46: 1103–1110
  12. Lenoir A. 1979. Le comportement alimentaire et la division du travail chez la fourmi Lasius niger. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 113: 79–314
  13. Mailleux A.C., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.L. 2000. How do the ants assess food volume? Anim. Behav. 59: 1061–1069
  14. Mailleux A.C., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.L. 2006. Starvation drives a threshold triggering communication. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 4224–4229
  15. Mailleux A.C., Buffin A., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.L. 2010. Recruiter or recruit: who boots the recruitment in starved nests in mass foraging ants? Anim. Behav. 79: 31–35
  16. Seeley T.D. 1986. Social foraging by honeybees: How colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 343–354
  17. Seeley T.D. 1995. The Wisdom of the Hive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 295 pp
  18. Sempo G., Depickère S. and Detrain C. 2006a. How brood influences caste aggregation patterns in the dimorphic ant species Pheidole pallidula. Behav. Ecol. 53: 241–248
  19. Sempo G., Depickère S. and Detrain C. 2006b. Spatial organization in a dimorphic ant: caste specificity of clustering patterns and area marking. Insect. Soc. 17: 642–650
  20. Sendova-Franks A.B. and Franks N.R. 1995. Spatial relationships within nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour. Anim. Behav. 50: 121–136
  21. Toth A.L. and Robinson G.E. 2005. Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees. Anim. Behav. 69: 427–435
  22. Toth A.L., Kantarovitch S., Meisel A.F. and Robinson G.E. 2005. Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in honey bees. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 4641–4649
  23. Trumbo S.T., Huang Z.Y. and Robinson G.E. 1997. Division of labor between undertaker specialists and other middle-aged workers in honey bee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 151–163
  24. Wallis D.I. 1962. The relation between hunger, activity and worker function in an ant colony. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 139: 589–605
  25. Wilson E.O. 1962. Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The organisation of mass-foraging. Anim. Behav. 10: 134–147
  26. Wilson E.O. and Hölldobler B. 2005. Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 16119–16119