User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

MASC, a qualitative multi-attribute decision model for ex ante assessment of the sustainability of cropping systems

Primary tabs

Sadok, Walid [INRA] Angevin, F. [INRA] Bergez, J-E. [INRA] Bockstaller, C. [INRA] Colomb, B. [INRA] Doré, T. [AgroParisTech]

Realistic assessments of sustainability are often viewed as typical decision-making problems requiring multi-criteria decision-aid (MCDA) methods taking into account the conflicting objectives underlying the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability, and the different sources of knowledge representing them. Some MCDA-based studies have resulted in the development of sustainable agricultural systems, but the new challenges facing agriculture and the increasing unpredictability of their driving forces highlight the need for faster ex ante (`Before-the-event') assessment frameworks. These frameworks should also (i) provide a more realistic assessment of sustainability, by integrating a wider range of informal knowledge, via the use of qualitative information; (ii) address alternative scales, such as cropping system level, improving granularity for the handling of sustainability issues and (iii) target a larger panel of decision-makers and contexts. We describe here the MASC model, which is at the center of a framework addressing these objectives. The MASC model has at its core a decision tree that breaks the sustainability assessment decisional problem down into simpler units as a function of sustainability dimensional structure (economic, social and environmental), generating a vector of 32 holistic `mixed' (quantitative and qualitative) elementary criteria rating cropping systems. The assessment process involves the calculation of these criteria, their homogenization into qualitative information for input into the model and their aggregation throughout the decision tree based on `If-Then' decision rules, entered by the user. We present the model and describe its first implementation for the evaluation of four cropping systems generated from expert knowledge, and discuss its relevance to the objectives cited above. The MASC model has several advantages over existing methods, due to its ability to handle qualitative information, its transparency, flexibility and feasibility.

  1. Andreoli M, Rossi R, Tellarini V, Farm sustainability assessment: some procedural issues, 10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00045-6
  2. Baker D., Bridges D., Hunter R., Johnson G., Krupa J., Murphy J., Sorenson K. (2002) Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods, WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA.
  3. Bergez J.E., Colbach N., Crespo O., Garcia F., Jeuffroy M.H., Justes E., Loyce C., Munier-Jolain N., Sadok W. (2008) Designing crop management systems by simulation, in: Donatelli M., Hatfield J., Rizzoli A. (Eds.), Farming Systems Design 2007, Int. Symposium on Methodologies on Integrated Analysis on Farm Production Systems, Catania (Italy), 10–12 September 2007, book 2 — Fieldfarm scale design and improvement, pp. 4–5.
  4. Bockstaller C., Girardin P. (2006) Mode de calcul des indicateurs agri-environnementaux de la méthode INDIGO (Version 1.61 du logiciel), INRA COLMAR/ARAA.
  5. Bockstaller C, Girardin P, van der Werf H.M.G, Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems, 10.1016/s1161-0301(97)00041-5
  6. Bohanec M. (2003) Decision support, in: Mladeniæ D., Lavraè N., Bohanec M., Moyle S. (Eds.), Data mining and decision support: Integration and collaboration, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 23–35.
  7. Bohanec Marko, Cortet Jérôme, Griffiths Bryan, Žnidaršič Martin, Debeljak Marko, Caul Sandra, Thompson Jacqueline, Krogh Paul H., A qualitative multi-attribute model for assessing the impact of cropping systems on soil quality, 10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.03.006
  8. Bohanec M., Messéan M., Scatasta S., Angevin F., Griffiths B., Krogh P.H., Znidarsic M., Dzeroski S. (2008) A qualitative multi-attribute model for economic and ecological assessment of genetically modified crops, Ecol. Model. (in press), doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.016.
  9. Bohanec Marko, Zupan Blaž, Rajkovič Vladislav, Applications of qualitative multi-attribute decision models in health care, 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00087-3
  10. Braband Dorothee, Geier Uwe, Köpke Ulrich, Bio-resource evaluation within agri-environmental assessment tools in different European countries, 10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00101-4
  11. van Calker K.J., Berentsen P.B.M., de Boer I.J.M., Giesen G.W.J., Huirne R.B.M., Modelling worker physical health and societal sustainability at farm level: An application to conventional and organic dairy farming, 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.006
  12. Champeaux C. (2006) Recours à l’utilisation de pesticides en grandes cultures : évolution de l’indicateur de fréquence de traitements au travers des enquêtes “pratiques culturales” du SCEES entre 1994 et 2001. INRA, UMR d’Agronomie de Grignon, rapport d’étude commanditée par le MAP (DGFAR), 100 p.
  13. Christen O. (1998) No more definitions please! Some reflections about the ideas and principles of sustainable agriculture, in: El Bassam N., Behl R.K., Prochnow B. (Eds.), Sustainable Agriculture for Food, Energy and Industry, James & James, London, pp. 48–52.
  14. Clemen R.T. (1996) Making Hard Decisions: an Introduction to Decision Analysis, Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  15. Coquil X., Blouet B., Fiorelli J.L., Mignolet C., Bazard C., Foissy D., Trommenschlager J.M., Benoît M., Meynard J.M. (2007) Prototyping connected farming systems at a small territory scale, in: Donatelli M., Hatfield J., Rizzoli A. (Eds.), Farming Systems Design 2007, Int. Symposium on Methodologies on Integrated Analysis on Farm Production Systems, Catania (Italy), 10–12 September 2007, book 2 — Field-farm scale design and improvement, pp. 120–121.
  16. Biggelaar Christoffel den, 10.1023/a:1026584105482
  17. Dent J.B., Edwards-Jones G., McGregor M.J., Simulation of ecological, social and economic factors in agricultural systems, 10.1016/0308-521x(95)00029-5
  18. Dogliotti S, Rossing W.A.H, van Ittersum M.K, rotat, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations, 10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00047-3
  19. Dogliotti S, Rossing W.A.H, van Ittersum M.K, Systematic design and evaluation of crop rotations enhancing soil conservation, soil fertility and farm income: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay, 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.001
  20. Dogliotti S., van Ittersum M.K., Rossing W.A.H., A method for exploring sustainable development options at farm scale: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay, 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.08.002
  21. Döring T.F., Hiller A., Wehke S., Schulte G., Broll G., Biotic indicators of carabid species richness on organically and conventionally managed arable fields, 10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00075-6
  22. Espinosa A., Harnden R., Walker J., A complexity approach to sustainability – Stafford Beer revisited, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.023
  23. European Commission (2005) Impact Assessment Guidelines, 15th of June 2005 with March 2006 Update, SEC (2005) 791.
  24. Figueira JosÉ, Greco Salvatore, Ehrogott Matthias, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, ISBN:9780387230672, 10.1007/b100605
  25. Gafsi Mohamed, Legagneux Bruno, Nguyen Geneviève, Robin Patrice, Towards sustainable farming systems: Effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture, 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.01.002
  26. Häni F., Braga F., Stämpfli A., Keller T., Fischer M., Porsche H. (2003) RISE, a tool for holistic sustainability assessment at the farm level, Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 6, 78–90.
  27. Hansen J.W., Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept?, 10.1016/0308-521x(95)00011-s
  28. Hietala-Koivu Reija, Järvenpää Tiia, Helenius Juha, Value of semi-natural areas as biodiversity indicators in agricultural landscapes, 10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00273-1
  29. Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Performances and Value Trade-Offs, Wiley, New York.
  30. Kirchmann Holger, Thorvaldsson Gudni, Challenging targets for future agriculture, 10.1016/s1161-0301(99)00053-2
  31. Lançon J., Reau R., Cariolle M., Munier-Jolain N., Omon B., Petit M.-S., Viaux P., Wery J. (2008) Élaboration à dire d’experts de systèmes de culture innovants, in: Reau R., Doré T. (Eds.), Systèmes de Culture Innovants et Durables: Quelles méthodes pour les mettre au point et les évaluer? Educagri Editions, Dijon, pp. 71–89.
  32. Loyce C, Rellier J.P, Meynard J.M, Management planning for winter wheat with multiple objectives (1): The BETHA system, 10.1016/s0308-521x(01)00064-6
  33. Ma L. (2006) Knowledge Representation Under Inherent Uncertainty in a Multi-Agent System for Land Use Planning, Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 164 p.
  34. Matthies Michael, Giupponi Carlo, Ostendorf Bertram, Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.09.005
  35. Maystre L.Y., Pictet J., Simos J. (1994) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.
  36. Mazzetto Fabrizio, Bonera Roberto, MEACROS: a tool for multi-criteria evaluation of alternative cropping systems, 10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00127-2
  37. Meul Marijke, Passel Steven, Nevens Frank, Dessein Joost, Rogge Elke, Mulier Annelies, Hauwermeiren Annelies, MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability, 10.1051/agro:2008001
  38. Meyer-Aurich Andreas, Economic and environmental analysis of sustainable farming practices – a Bavarian case study, 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.09.007
  39. Meynard J.M. (2008) Produire autrement: réinventer les systèmes de culture, in: Reau R., Doré T. (Eds.), Systèmes de Culture Innovants et Durables : Quelles méthodes pour les mettre au point et les évaluer? Educagri Editions, Dijon, pp. 11–27.
  40. MSA (Mutualité Sociale Agricole, 2006) Approche statistique des risques professionnels des non salariés agricoles : Synthèse nationale, Caisse Centrale de la MSA — Santé-Sécurité au Travail, 6 p. http://www.msa.fr/files/msafr/msafr_1166005823772_APPROCHE_DES_RISQUES_PROFESSIONNELS_DES_NON_SALARI_S_AGRICOLES_2006.pdf.
  41. Munda G. (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development, in: Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  42. Munda G., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P., Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management, 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90002-7
  43. Neher Deborah, Ecological Sustainability in Agricultural Systems : Definition and Measurement, 10.1300/j064v02n03_05
  44. Osinski Elisabeth, Meier Uwe, Büchs Wolfgang, Weickel Joerg, Matzdorf Bettina, Application of biotic indicators for evaluation of sustainable land use—current procedures and future developments, 10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00100-2
  45. Pacini Cesare, Wossink Ada, Giesen Gerard, Vazzana Concetta, Huirne Ruud, Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis, 10.1016/s0167-8809(02)00091-9
  46. Paoletti Maurizio G., The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators, 10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00034-1
  47. Parisi Vittorio, Menta Cristina, Gardi Ciro, Jacomini Carlo, Mozzanica Enrico, Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy, 10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.002
  48. Phillis Yannis A, Andriantiatsaholiniaina Luc A, Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic, 10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00290-1
  49. Reau R., Landé N. (2006) Evaluation a priori de systèmes de culture innovants conçus par des experts et adaptés a des contextes régionaux, Final Report on Work Package#1, ADAR project “Systèmes de cultures innovants”, 27 p.
  50. Reau R. et al. (2006) Actes du Séminaire “Systèmes de culture innovants” — Projet ADAR Systèmes de culture innovants piloté par le CETIOM, Versailles, 27 juin 2006.
  51. Rosnoblet J., Girardin P., Weinzaepflen E., Bockstaller C. (2006) Analysis of 15 years of agriculture sustainability evaluation methods, in: Fotyma M., Kaminska B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th ESA Congress. Warsaw, Poland, September 4–6, 2006, pp. 707–708.
  52. Rossing W.A.H, Meynard J.M, van Ittersum M.K, Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: case studies from France and the Netherlands, 10.1016/s1161-0301(97)00042-7
  53. Saaty T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  54. Sadok Walid, Angevin Frédérique, Bergez Jacques-Éric, Bockstaller Christian, Colomb Bruno, Guichard Laurence, Reau Raymond, Doré Thierry, Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review, 10.1051/agro:2007043
  55. Sebillotte M. (1990) Système de culture, un concept opératoire pour les agronomes, in: Combe L., Picard D. (Eds.), Un point sur les systèmes de culture, INRA éditions, Paris, pp. 165–196.
  56. Schaller Neill, The concept of agricultural sustainability, 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90016-i
  57. Shrestha Ram K, Alavalapati Janaki R.R, Kalmbacher Robert S, Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT–AHP method, 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.09.004
  58. Spoor G, Tijink F.G.J, Weisskopf P, Subsoil compaction: risk, avoidance, identification and alleviation, 10.1016/s0167-1987(03)00109-0
  59. Steen I. (1998) Phosphorus availability in the 21st Century: management of a non renewable resource, Phosphorus Potassium 217, 25–31.
  60. Stewart W.M., Hammond L.L., Van Kauwenbergh S.J. (2005) Phosphorus as a Natural Resource, in: Sims J.T., Sharpley A.N. (Eds.), Agriculture and the Environment, Agronomy Monograph No. 46, ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin 53711 USA, pp. 3–22.
  61. Van Cauwenbergh N., Biala K., Bielders C., Brouckaert V., Franchois L., Garcia Cidad V., Hermy M., Mathijs E., Muys B., Reijnders J., Sauvenier X., Valckx J., Vanclooster M., Van der Veken B., Wauters E., Peeters A., SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems, 10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.006
  62. van de Zande J.C., Computed reconstruction of field traffic patterns, 10.1016/0167-1987(91)90105-7
  63. van Ittersum Martin K., Ewert Frank, Heckelei Thomas, Wery Jacques, Alkan Olsson Johanna, Andersen Erling, Bezlepkina Irina, Brouwer Floor, Donatelli Marcello, Flichman Guillermo, Olsson Lennart, Rizzoli Andrea E., van der Wal Tamme, Wien Jan Erik, Wolf Joost, Integrated assessment of agricultural systems – A component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS), 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.07.009
  64. Vereijken P, A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms, 10.1016/s1161-0301(97)00039-7
  65. Vilain L., Boisset K., Girardin P., Guillaumin A., Mouchet C., Viaux P., Zahm F. (2008) La méthode IDEA indicateur de durabilité des exploitations agricoles — guide d’utilisation (ed collectif O.), Educagri éditions, Dijon, 184 p.
  66. Walter C. (2006) Sustainability assessment of land use systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 180 p.
  67. Zander P, Kächele H, Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development, 10.1016/s0308-521x(99)00017-7
Bibliographic reference Sadok, Walid ; Angevin, F. ; Bergez, J-E. ; Bockstaller, C. ; Colomb, B. ; et. al. MASC, a qualitative multi-attribute decision model for ex ante assessment of the sustainability of cropping systems. In: Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 29, no. 3, p. 447-461 (2009)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/71990