User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning

Primary tabs

Araujo, MB Thuiller, W Williams, PH Reginster, I.

Aim One of the limitations to using species' distribution atlases in conservation planning is their coarse resolution relative to the needs of local planners. In this study, a simple approach to downscale original species atlas distributions to a finer resolution is outlined. If such a procedure yielded accurate downscaled predictions, then it could be an aid to using available distribution atlases in real-world local conservation decisions. Location Europe. Methods An iterative procedure based on generalized additive modelling is used to downscale original European 50 x 50 km distributions of 2189 plant and terrestrial vertebrate species to c. 10 x 10 km grid resolution. Models are trained on 70% of the original data and evaluated on the remaining 30%, using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure. Fitted models are then interpolated to a finer resolution. A British dataset comprising distributions of 81 passerine-bird species in a 10 x 10 km grid is used as a test bed to assess the accuracy of the downscaled predictions. European-wide, downscaled predictions are further evaluated in terms of their ability to reproduce: (1) spatial patterns of coincidence in species richness scores among different groups; and (2) spatial patterns of coincidence in richness, rarity and complementarity hotspots. Results There was a generally good agreement between downscaled and observed fine-resolution distributions for passerine species in Britain (median Jaccard similarity = 70%; lower quartile = 36%; upper quartile = 88%). In contrast, the correlation between downscaled and observed passerine species richness was relatively low (rho = 0.31) indicating a pattern of error propagation through the process of overlaying downscaled distributions for many species. It was also found that measures of model accuracy in fitting original data (ROC) were a poor predictor of models' ability to interpolate distributions at fine resolutions (rho = -0.10). Although European hotspots were not fully coincident between observed and modelled coarse-resolution data, or between modelled coarse resolution and modelled downscaled data, there was evidence that downscaled distributions were able to maintain original cross-taxon coincidence of species-richness scores, at least for terrestrial vertebrate groups. Downscaled distributions were also able to uncover important environmental gradients otherwise blurred by coarse-resolution data. Main conclusions Despite uncertainties, downscaling procedures may prove useful to identify reserves that are more meaningfully related to local patterns of environmental variation. Potential errors arising from the presence of false positives may be reduced if downscaled-distribution records projected to occur outside the range of original coarse-resolution data are excluded. However, the usefulness of this procedure may be limited to data-rich regions. If downscaling procedures are applied to data-poor regions, then there is a need to undertake further research to understand the structure of error in models. In particular, it would be important to investigate which species are poorly modelled, where and why. Without such an assessment it is difficult to support unsupervised use of downscaled data in most real-world situations.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Synthèse de littérature
Publication date 2005
Language Anglais
Journal information "Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters" - Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 17-30 (2005)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford)
issn 0960-7447
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL
Keywords complementarity ; distribution atlas ; downscaling ; interpolation ; generalized additive models ; rarity hotspots ; richness hotspots ; ROC curve ; reserve selection
Links
  1. Turner John R. G., Lennon Jack J., Lawrenson Jane A., British bird species distributions and the energy theory, 10.1038/335539a0
  2. Williams Paul H., Klerk Helen M., Crowe Timothy M., Interpreting biogeographical boundaries among Afrotropical birds: spatial patterns in richness gradients and species replacement, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00294.x
  3. Koleff Patricia, Gaston Kevin J., The relationships between local and regional species richness and spatial turnover, 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00302.x
  4. van Rensburg B. J., Chown S. L., Gaston K. J., Species Richness, Environmental Correlates, and Spatial Scale: A Test Using South African Birds, 10.1086/339464
  5. Araújo Miguel B., The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe : People and biodiversity in Europe, 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00314.x
  6. REBELO A. G., SIEGFRIED W. R., Where Should Nature Reserves Be Located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the Spatial Configuration of a Reserve Network Aimed at Maximizing the Protection of Floral Diversity, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620243.x
  7. Araújo Miguel B, Williams Paul H, Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data, 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00074-4
  8. Williams Paul H., Burgess Neil D., Rahbek Carsten, Flagship species, ecological complementarity and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub-Saharan Africa, 10.1017/s1367943000000974
  9. Araújo (m.araujo@nhm.ac.uk) M. B., Humphries C. J., Densham P. J., Lampinen R., Hagemeijer W. J. M., Mitchell-Jones A. J., Gasc J. P., Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity?, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240112.x
  10. Araujo M.B., Biological Conservation, 18, 553 (2004)
  11. Stoms D.M., Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58, 1587 (1992)
  12. Stoms D.M., Professional Geographer, 46, 346 (1994)
  13. Hopkinson Paul, Evans Julianne, Gregory Richard D., National-scale conservation assessments at an appropriate resolution, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00085.x
  14. Hulme Philip E., Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war?, 10.1017/s003060530300036x
  15. Rouget Mathieu, Measuring conservation value at fine and broad scales: implications for a diverse and fragmented region, the Agulhas Plain, 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00415-9
  16. Boitani L., A databank for the conservation and management of the African Mammals (1999)
  17. Freitag S., South African Journal of Science, 94, 79 (1998)
  18. Nix H.A., Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia, 4 (1986)
  19. Pearson R.G, Dawson T.P, Berry P.M, Harrison P.A, SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species, 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00056-x
  20. Pearson Richard G., Dawson Terence P., Liu Canran, Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x
  21. Márcia Barbosa A., Real Raimundo, Olivero Jesús, Mario Vargas J., Otter ( Lutra lutra ) distribution modeling at two resolution scales suited to conservation planning in the Iberian Peninsula, 10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00066-1
  22. Stockwell David, Peterson A.Townsend, Comparison of resolution of methods used in mapping biodiversity patterns from point-occurrence data, 10.1016/s1470-160x(03)00045-1
  23. Bio A.M.F., Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 5 (1998)
  24. Franklin J., Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 733 (1998)
  25. Pearce Jennie, Ferrier Simon, An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression, 10.1016/s0304-3800(99)00227-6
  26. Elith J., Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale, 303 (2002)
  27. Thuiller W., Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 669 (2003)
  28. Segurado P., Journal of Biogeography (2004)
  29. Mitchell-Jones A.J., Atlas of European mammals (1999)
  30. Hagemeijer W.J.M., The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds, their distribution and abundance (1997)
  31. Gasc J.-P., Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe (1997)
  32. Jalas J., Altas Florae Europaeae (1972)
  33. Humphries C., Acta Botanica Fennica, 162, 11 (1999)
  34. Lahti T., Acta Botanica Fennica, 162, 5 (1999)
  35. Williams P.H., Belgian Journal of Entomology, 2, 21 (2000)
  36. Sharrock J.T.R., The atlas of breeding birds of Britain and Ireland (1976)
  37. Gibbons D.W., The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988-1991 (1993)
  38. Gates Simon, Donald Paul F., Local extinction of British farmland birds and the prediction of further loss, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00549.x
  39. Donald P.F., IBIS, 143, 783 (2001)
  40. Araujo M. B., Williams P. H., Fuller R. J., Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2121
  41. Bartlein P.J., Journal of Biogeography, 13, 35 (1986)
  42. Woodward F. I., Williams B. G., Climate and plant distribution at global and local scales, 10.1007/bf00038700
  43. Prentice I.C., Journal of Biogeography, 19, 117 (1992)
  44. Sykes M.T., Past and future rapid environment changes: the spatial and evolutionary responses of terrestrial biota (1997)
  45. C.A. Mucher (2000 ) PELCOM project 'development of a consistent methodology to derive land cover information on a European scale from remote sensing for environmental modelling'. Final report February 2000, part 2, EU DG XII-D.
  46. CEC, CORINE land cover technical guide (1993)
  47. Stockwell David R.B, Peterson A.Townsend, Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models, 10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00388-x
  48. Hastie T.J., Generalized additive models (1990)
  49. Thuiller Wilfried, Araújo Miguel B, Lavorel Sandra, Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? : Do land-cover data improve bioclimatic models?, 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00991.x
  50. FIELDING Alan H., BELL JOHN F., A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models, 10.1017/s0376892997000088
  51. Anon, S-PLUS 2000 user's guide. (1999)
  52. Williams Paul, Gibbons David, Margules Chris, Rebelo Anthony, Humphries Chris, Pressey Robert, A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010155.x
  53. Araujo Miguel B., Distribution patterns of biodiversity and the design of a representative reserve network in Portugal. BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00052.x
  54. Dobson A. P., Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States, 10.1126/science.275.5299.550
  55. Araújo Miguel B., Williams Paul H., The Bias of Complementarity Hotspots toward Marginal Populations, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99450.x
  56. Araújo Miguel B., Williams Paul H., Turner Andy, 10.1023/a:1015809008522
  57. Church Richard L., Stoms David M., Davis Frank W., Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00102-6
  58. Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O., Pressey R.L., Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity, 10.1016/0006-3207(88)90078-x
  59. P.H. Williams (1999 ) WORLDMAP 4 Windows: software and help document 4.2. Distributed Privately, London. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/projects/worldmap.
  60. Swets K.A., Science, 240, 1285 (1988)
  61. Rahbek C., Ecography, 18, 200 (1995)
  62. Grytnes John Arvid, Vetaas Ole R., Species Richness and Altitude: A Comparison between Null Models and Interpolated Plant Species Richness along the Himalayan Altitudinal Gradient, Nepal, 10.1086/338542
  63. Guisan Antoine, Zimmermann Niklaus E., Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology, 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9
  64. Pearson Richard G., Dawson Terence P., Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?, 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x
  65. Kunin W. E., Extrapolating Species Abundance Across Spatial Scales, 10.1126/science.281.5382.1513
  66. He Fangliang, Gaston Kevin J., Estimating Species Abundance from Occurrence, 10.1086/303403
  67. Kunin William E., Hartley Stephen, Lennon Jack J., Scaling Down: On the Challenge of Estimating Abundance from Occurrence Patterns, 10.1086/303408
  68. Faith D. P., Walker P. A., Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas, 10.1007/bf00056387
  69. Faith D. P., Walker P. A., Integrating conservation and development: incorporating vulnerability into biodiversity-assessment of areas, 10.1007/bf00056388
  70. Araújo M. B., Densham P., Humphries C., Predicting species diversity with ED: the quest for evidence, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03625.x
  71. Araujo M. B., Densham P. J., Williams P. H., Representing species in reserves from patterns of assemblage diversity, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01051.x
  72. Brotons Lluís, Thuiller Wilfried, Araújo Miguel B., Hirzel Alexandre H., Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03764.x
  73. Peterson A.T., Bioscience, 51, 363 (2001)
  74. Thuiller Wilfried, Brotons Lluis, Araújo Miguel B., Lavorel Sandra, Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03673.x
  75. Beutel T.S., Ecography, 22, 219 (1999)
  76. Oreskes N., Science, 263, 641 (1994)
  77. Flather C.H., Ecological Applications, 7, 531 (1997)
  78. James A., Bioscience, 51, 43 (2001)
  79. Slobodkin L.B., Bioscience, 38, 337 (1988)
Bibliographic reference Araujo, MB ; Thuiller, W ; Williams, PH ; Reginster, I.. Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 17-30 (2005)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/39608