User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin

Primary tabs

Sarr, Mouhamed [UCL] Mine, Atsushi [UCL] De Munck, Jan [KUL] Cardoso, Marcio Vivan [UCL] Kane, Abdoul Wakhabe Vreven, José [UCL] Van Meerbeek, Bart [UCL] Van Landuyt, Kirsten L. [UCL]

The objective of this study was to compare the one-week bonding effectiveness of nine contemporary composite cements used to lute ceramic to dentin and to determine an appropriate processing method for pretesting failures. The microtensile bond strengths (mu TBS) of different luting agents including five self-adhesive cements (Unicem, 3 M ESPE; Maxcem, Kerr; Monocem, Shofu; G-Cem, GC; and Multilink Sprint, Ivoclar-Vivadent), two self-etch cements (Panavia F2.0 and Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Kuraray), and two etch-and-rinse cements (Calibra, Dentsply, and Variolink IT, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were measured using a standardized protocol. As control, a two-step self-etch adhesive combined with a restorative composite (Clearfil SE+Clearfil APX, Kuraray) were included as luting material. Depending on the processing of the pretesting failures, two groups of cements could be distinguished: (1) those with low bond strength and many pretesting failures and (2) those with relatively high bond strength and few pretesting failures. Nevertheless, the control luting procedure involving a self-etch adhesive combined with a restorative composite presented with a significantly higher mu TBS. The mu TBS was clearly product-dependent rather than being dependent on the actual adhesive approach. Fracture analysis indicated that failure usually occurred at the dentin cement interface especially for the cements with low bond strength and many pretesting failures. Depending on the cement system, an adequate immediate ceramic-to-dentin bond strength can be obtained, even with self-adhesive cements that do not use a separate dental adhesive. Yet, the self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE combined with the restorative composite revealed a superior bonding performance and should therefore be preferred in clinical situations where the restoration transmits light sufficiently.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2010
Language Anglais
Journal information "Clinical Oral Investigations" - Vol. 14, no. 5, p. 569-577 (2010)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer Heidelberg (Heidelberg)
issn 1432-6981
e-issn 1436-3771
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - MD/MDEN - Ecole de médecine dentaire et de stomatologie
Keywords Luting ; Cement ; Pretesting failure ; Self-adhesive cement ; Self-etch cement ; Etch-and-rinse cement
Links
  1. Saskalauskaite E, Tam LE, McComb D (2008) Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. J Prosthodont 17:262–268
  2. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235
  3. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971
  4. Paul SJ, Scharer P (1997) The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17:536–545
  5. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2007) Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 23:71–80
  6. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 22:533–544
  7. Sidhu S. K., Omata Y., Tanaka T., Koshiro K., Spreafico D., Semeraro S., Mezzanzanica D., Sano H., Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives, 10.1002/jbm.b.30597
  8. Proenca JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Erhardt MC, Aguilera FS, Garcia-Godoy F, Osorio R, Toledano M (2007) Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 23:1542–1548
  9. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW (2006) In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I–microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 8:367–373
  10. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 9:7–10
  11. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (1998) The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212–221
  12. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (1998) Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 14:120–128
  13. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH (2001) Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 3:207–225
  14. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P (2004) Four-year water degradation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 112:73–83
  15. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28:3757–3785
  16. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458
  17. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic. J Dent 35:282–288
  18. Stewart GP, Jain P, Hodges J (2002) Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 88:277–284
  19. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J (1995) Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 74:381–387
  20. Brentel AS, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Alarca LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA (2007) Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 23:1323–1331
  21. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A (1999) Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 24:147–155
  22. Ozturk N, Aykent F (2003) Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 89:275–281
  23. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 20:191–197
  24. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2006) Effect of the seating pressure on the adhesive bonding of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 19:333–336
  25. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007) The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater 23:159–164
Bibliographic reference Sarr, Mouhamed ; Mine, Atsushi ; De Munck, Jan ; Cardoso, Marcio Vivan ; Kane, Abdoul Wakhabe ; et. al. Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. In: Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 14, no. 5, p. 569-577 (2010)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/34987