User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita)

Primary tabs

Stevens, Virginie M. [UCL] Le Boulengé, Éric [UCL] Wesselingh, Renate A. [UCL] Baguette, Michel [UCL]

Like other pond-breeding amphibians, the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) typically presents a patchy distribution. Because the species experiences high probabilities of local population extinction, its persistence within landscapes relies on both local and landscape-scale processes [dispersal allowing the (re)colonization of habitat patches]. However, the structure and composition of the matrix surrounding local populations can alter the dispersal rates between populations. As shown previously (Landscape Ecol 19:829-842, 2004), the locomotor performances of individuals at the dispersal stage depend on the nature of the component crossed: some landscape components offer high resistance to movement (high resistance or high viscosity components) whereas others allow high efficiency of movement (low resistance components). We now examine the ability of individuals to discriminate between landscape components and select low-resistance components. Our experimental study investigates the ways in which young natterjack toads choose from among landscape components common to southern Belgium. Toadlets (the dispersal stage) were experimentally confronted with boundaries between surrogates of sandy soils, roads, forests, agricultural fields and intensive pastures. Our results show: 1 the ability of toadlets to react to boundaries between landscape components, 2 differences in permeability among boundaries, and 3 our inability to predict correctly the permeability of the boundaries from the patch-specific resistance assessed previously. Toadlets showed a preference for bare environments and forests, whereas they avoided the use of agricultural environments. This pattern could not be explained in terms of patch-specific resistance only, and is discussed in terms of mortality risks and resource availability in the various landscape components, with particular attention to repercussions on conservation strategies.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche – Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2006
Language Anglais
Journal information "Oecologia" - Vol. 150, no. 1, p. 161-71 (2006)
Peer reviewed yes
issn 0029-8549
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SC/BIOL - Département de biologie
MESH Subject Animals ; Belgium ; Bufonidae - physiology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Demography ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Linear Models ; Locomotion - physiology ; Population Dynamics
Keywords 3123
Links
  1. Baguette M, Stevens VM (2003) Local populations and metapopulations are both natural and operational categories. Oikos 101:661–663
  2. Beebee TJC (1983) The natterjack toad. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  3. Brown JA, Kodrick-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449
  4. Burel F, Baudry J (1999) Ecologie du paysage. Concepts, méthodes et applications. Tec and Doc, Paris
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
  6. Charrier S, Petit S, Burel F (1997) Movements of Abax parallelepipedus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in woody habitats of a hedgerow network landscape: a radio-tracing study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 61:133–144
  7. Denton JS, Beebee TJC (1996) Habitat occupancy by juvenile natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) on grazed and ungrazed heathland. Herpetol J 6:49–52
  8. Doncaster CP, Rondinini C, Johnson PCD (2001) Field test for environmental correlates of dispersal in hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus. J Anim Ecol 70:33–46
  9. Driscoll DA (1997) Mobility and metapopulation structure of Geocrinia alba and Geocrinia vitellina, two endangered frog species from Southwestern Australia. Aust J Ecol 22:185–195
  10. Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12:346–353
  11. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1985) Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–1768
  12. Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2004) Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biol Conserv 119:219–230
  13. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York
  14. Gathoye JL (1998) Calamites sur Hez. Reserves Nat 4:4
  15. Gibbs JP (1998) Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in southern New England. J Wildl Manage 62:584–589
  16. Goodwin BJ, Fahrig L (2002) How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99:552–570
  17. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecol Appl 9:612–622
  18. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49
  19. Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87:209–219
  20. Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, New York
  21. Harrison S (1994) Metapopulations and conservation. In: Edwards PJ, May RM, Webb NR (eds) Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell, UK pp 111–128
  22. Hels T, Buchwald E (2001) The effect of road kills on amphibian populations. Biol Conserv 99:331–340
  23. Ims Rolf A., Yoccoz Nigel G., Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations, Metapopulation Biology (1997) ISBN:9780123234452 p.247-265, 10.1016/b978-012323445-2/50015-8
  24. Johnson AR, Wiens JA, Milne BT, Crist TO (1992) Animal movements and population-dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landsc Ecol 7:63–75
  25. Johst K, Brandl R, Eber S (2002) Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 98:263–270
  26. Joly P, Miaud C, Lehmann A, Grolet O (2001) Habitat matrix effects on pond occupancy in newts. Conserv Biol 15:239–248
  27. Jonsen ID, Taylor PD (2000) Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation. Oikos 88:553–562
  28. Jordan F, Baldi A, Orci KM, Racz I, Varga Z (2003) Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation. Landsc Ecol 18:83–92
  29. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241
  30. Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:131–135
  31. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS, Cary, N.C.
  32. Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol 15:40–49
  33. Mauremooto JR, Wratten SD, Worner SP, Fry GLA (1995) Permeability of hedgerows to predatory carabid beetles. Agric Ecosyst Environ 52:141–148
  34. McCullagh P., Nelder J. A., Generalized Linear Models, ISBN:9780412317606, 10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6
  35. Merriam G, Kosakiewicz M, Tsuchiya E, Hawley K (1989) Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes. Landsc Ecol 2:227–235
  36. Miaud C, Sanuy D (2005) Terrestrial habitat preferences of the natterjack toad during and after the breeding season in a landscape of intense agricultural activity. Amphib Reptil 26:359–366
  37. Miaud C, Sanuy D, Avrillier JN (2000) Terrestrial movements of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita (Amphibia, Anura) in a semi-arid, agricultural landscape. Amphib Reptil 21:357–369
  38. Percsy C, Jacob JP, Percsy N, deWavrin H, Remacle A (1997) Projet d’atlas herpétologique pour la Wallonie et Bruxelles. AVES
  39. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99
  40. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70:840–852
  41. Rothermel BB, Semlitsch RD (2002) An experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:1324–1332
  42. Ruckelshaus M, Hartway C, Kareiva P (1997) Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models. Conserv Biol 11:1298–1306
  43. Rustigian HL, Santelmann MV, Schumaker NH (2003) Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics. Landsc Ecol 18:65–81
  44. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration–patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 72:533–545
  45. Semlitsch RD (2002) Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:619–629
  46. Sinsch U (1991) The orientation behavior of amphibians. Herpetol J 1:541–544
  47. Sinsch U (1997) Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112:42–47
  48. Stamps JA, Buechner M, Krishnan VV (1987) The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. Am Nat 129:533–552
  49. Stevens VM, Polus E, Wesselingh RA, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Landsc Ecol 19:829–842
  50. Stevens VM, Verkenne C, Vandewoestijne S, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M (2006) Gene flow and functional connectivity. Mol Ecol 15(9):2333–2344
  51. Stevens VM, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M (2003) Demographic processes in a small, isolated population of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in southern Belgium. Herpetol J 13:59–67
  52. Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2005) Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol 9:535–545
  53. Walker RS, Novaro AJ, Branch LC (2003) Effects of patch attributes, barriers, and distance between patches on the distribution of a rock-dwelling rodent (Lagidium viscacia). Landsc Ecol 18:187–194
  54. Wiens JA, Schooley RL, Weeks RD (1997) Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? Oikos 78:257–264
  55. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615
  56. Wilcox B, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125:879–887
  57. With KA (1994) Ontogenic shifts in how grasshoppers interact with landscape structure—an analysis of movement patterns. Funct Ecol 8:477–485
  58. With KA, Cadaret SJ, Davis C (1999) Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes. Ecology 80:1340–1353
  59. Wolfinger R, O’Connell M (1993) Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul 48
Bibliographic reference Stevens, Virginie M. ; Le Boulengé, Éric ; Wesselingh, Renate A. ; Baguette, Michel. Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). In: Oecologia, Vol. 150, no. 1, p. 161-71 (2006)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/23445