User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Using animal movement behavior to categorize land cover and predict consequences for connectivity and patch residence times

Primary tabs

Brown, Leone M. [Odum School of Ecology University of Georgia Athens USA] Fuda, Rebecca K. [Odum School of Ecology University of Georgia Athens USA] Schtickzelle, Nicolas [UCL] Coffman [Department of Biology Butler University Indianapolis USA] Jost, Audrey [UCL] Crone, Elizabeth E. [Department of Biology Tufts University Medford USA]

Context Landscape-scale population dynamics are driven in part by movement within and dispersal among habitat patches. Predicting these processes requires information about how movement behavior varies among land cover types. Objectives We investigated how butterfly movement in a heterogeneous landscape varies within and between habitat and matrix land cover types, and the implications of these differences for within-patch residence times and among-patch connectivity. Methods We empirically measured movement behavior in the Baltimore checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas phaeton) in three land cover classes that broadly constitute habitat and two classes that constitute matrix. We also measured habitat preference at boundaries. We predicted patch residence times and interpatch dispersal using movement parameters estimated separately for each habitat and matrix land cover subclass (5 categories), or for combined habitat and combined matrix land cover classes (2 categories). We evaluated the effects of including edge behavior on all metrics.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2017
Language Anglais
Journal information "Landscape Ecology" - , p. 1-14 (2017)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer Netherlands ((Netherlands) Dordrecht)
issn 0921-2973
e-issn 1572-9761
Publication status Accepté/Sous presse
Affiliation UCL - SST/ELI/ELIB - Biodiversity
Keywords Butterflies ; Dispersal ; Habitat heterogeneity ; Land cover classification ; Occupancy time ; Spatially-explicit individual-based models ; 3123
Links
  1. Baguette Michel, Van Dyck Hans, Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal, 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4
  2. Barton Kamil A., Phillips Ben L., Morales Juan M., Travis Justin M. J., The evolution of an ‘intelligent’ dispersal strategy: biased, correlated random walks in patchy landscapes, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16936.x
  3. Bates Douglas, Mächler Martin, Bolker Ben, Walker Steve, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  4. Bélisle Marc, MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 10.1890/04-0923
  5. Bender Darren J., Fahrig Lenore, MATRIX STRUCTURE OBSCURES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPATCH MOVEMENT AND PATCH SIZE AND ISOLATION, 10.1890/03-0769
  6. Berwaerts Koen, Van Dyck Hans, Take-off performance under optimal and suboptimal thermal conditions in the butterfly Pararge aegeria, 10.1007/s00442-004-1661-9
  7. Bonte Dries, Van Dyck Hans, Bullock James M., Coulon Aurélie, Delgado Maria, Gibbs Melanie, Lehouck Valerie, Matthysen Erik, Mustin Karin, Saastamoinen Marjo, Schtickzelle Nicolas, Stevens Virginie M., Vandewoestijne Sofie, Baguette Michel, Barton Kamil, Benton Tim G., Chaput-Bardy Audrey, Clobert Jean, Dytham Calvin, Hovestadt Thomas, Meier Christoph M., Palmer Steve C. F., Turlure Camille, Travis Justin M. J., Costs of dispersal, 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00201.x
  8. Bowers M. Deane, Stamp Nancy E., Collinge Sharon K., Early Stage of Host Range Expansion by a Specialist Herbivore, Euphydryas Phaeton (Nymphalidae), 10.2307/1940758
  9. Breed Greg A., Stichter Sharon, Crone Elizabeth E., Climate-driven changes in northeastern US butterfly communities, 10.1038/nclimate1663
  10. Brown Leone M., Crone Elizabeth E., Individual variation changes dispersal distance and area requirements of a checkerspot butterfly, 10.1002/ecy.1216
  11. Brown Leone M., Crone Elizabeth E., Minimum area requirements for an at-risk butterfly based on movement and demography : Movement, Demography, and Minimum Area, 10.1111/cobi.12588
  12. Brown Leone M., Breed Greg A., Severns Paul M., Crone Elizabeth E., Losing a battle but winning the war: moving past preference–performance to understand native herbivore–novel host plant interactions, 10.1007/s00442-016-3787-y
  13. Cobbold Christina A., Lutscher Frithjof, Mean occupancy time: linking mechanistic movement models, population dynamics and landscape ecology to population persistence, 10.1007/s00285-013-0642-1
  14. Crone Elizabeth E., Responses of Social and Solitary Bees to Pulsed Floral Resources, 10.1086/671999
  15. Crone EE, Schultz CB (2003) Movement behavior and minimum patch size for butterfly population persistence. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 561–576
  16. Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife (2013) Wildlife species conservation and research program—Delaware’s endangered species. http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/fw/NHESP/information/Pages/Endangered.aspx
  17. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint, 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12492.x
  18. Dias Maria P., Granadeiro José P., Palmeirim Jorge M., Searching behaviour of foraging waders: does feeding success influence their walking?, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.002
  19. Elderd B. D., Nott M. Philip, Hydrology, habitat change and population demography: an individual-based model for the endangered Cape Sable seaside sparrow Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis : Habitat change and population viability, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01369.x
  20. ESRI (2015) ArcMap 10.3. Environmental Systems Resource Institute: Redlands
  21. Fahrig Lenore, Baudry Jacques, Brotons Lluís, Burel Françoise G., Crist Thomas O., Fuller Robert J., Sirami Clelia, Siriwardena Gavin M., Martin Jean-Louis, Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes : Heterogeneity and biodiversity, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x
  22. Fischer Joern, B. Lindenmayer David, Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14148.x
  23. Fox J, Weisberg M (2011) An R companion to applied regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks
  24. Frye J, Durkin P, Gibbs D, Gibbs R, Lustig M (2013) Conservation and management of the Baltimore checkerspot (Euphydryas phaeton, Drury) in Maryland: strategies for statewide monitoring and for wetland resotration, captive breeding and release in the Piedmont region. In: Maryland Department of Natural Resources W. a. H. S., Natural Heritage Program (ed), 2 edn. Annapolis
  25. Georgia department of natural resources (2016) Special concern animals in Georgia. http://georgiawildlife.com/sites/default/files/uploads/wildlife/nongame/text/html/et_lists/span.html
  26. Graves Tabitha, Chandler Richard B., Royle J. Andrew, Beier Paul, Kendall Katherine C., Estimating landscape resistance to dispersal, 10.1007/s10980-014-0056-5
  27. Haddad Nick M., Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries, 10.1086/303163
  28. Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12(2):321–334
  29. Halstead Brian J., McCoy Earl D., Stilson Terri A., Mushinsky Henry R., ALTERNATIVE FORAGING TACTICS OF JUVENILE GOPHER TORTOISES (GOPHERUS POLYPHEMUS) EXAMINED USING CORRELATED RANDOM WALK MODELS, 10.1655/0018-0831(2007)63[472:aftojg]2.0.co;2
  30. HANSKI ILKKA, GILPIN MICHAEL, Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x
  31. Haynes Kyle J., Cronin James T., Confounding of patch quality and matrix effects in herbivore movement studies, 10.1023/b:land.0000021721.41349.85
  32. Haynes Kyle J., Dillemuth Forrest P., Anderson Bryan J., Hakes Alyssa S., Jackson Heather B., Elizabeth Jackson S., Cronin James T., Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distribution, 10.1007/s00442-006-0600-3
  33. HOLL KAREN D., CRONE ELIZABETH E., Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants : Riparian forest restoration, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00949.x
  34. Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 National land cover database for the counterminous United States—representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81(5):345–354
  35. Hudgens Brian R., Morris William F., Haddad Nick M., Fields William R., Wilson John W., Kuefler Daniel, Jobe Todd, How complex do models need to be to predict dispersal of threatened species through matrix habitats?, 10.1890/11-1048.1
  36. Iowa department of natural resources (2012) The Iowa wildlife Action plan—chapter 3: species of greatest conservation need
  37. Kays R., Crofoot M. C., Jetz W., Wikelski M., Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet, 10.1126/science.aaa2478
  38. Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol 23(8):879–890
  39. Kindvall Oskar, Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00273.x
  40. Knowlton Jessie L., Graham Catherine H., Using behavioral landscape ecology to predict species’ responses to land-use and climate change, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.011
  41. KOEN ERIN L., BOWMAN JEFF, WALPOLE AARON A., The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates : SENSITIVITY OF LANDSCAPE RESISTANCE ESTIMATES, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03123.x
  42. Kuefler Daniel, Hudgens Brian, Haddad Nick M., Morris William F., Thurgate Nicole, The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal, 10.1890/09-0614.1
  43. LeGrand J, Harry E., Ratcliffe JA, Finnegan JT, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (2014) Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina
  44. Lima Steven L., Zollner Patrick A., Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81094-9
  45. MassGIS (2014) USGS color ortho imagery 2013/2014. http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/datalayers/colororthos2013.html
  46. Matter Stephen F., Gargano Corey, Kim Kenneth I., Wick Anne, Forest Habitat Reduces the Flight ofPontia occidentalis(Reakirt) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Relative to Alpine Meadow Habitat, 10.18473/lepi.70i2.a5
  47. McClintock Brett T., King Ruth, Thomas Len, Matthiopoulos Jason, McConnell Bernie J., Morales Juan M., A general discrete-time modeling framework for animal movement using multistate random walks, 10.1890/11-0326.1
  48. MCINTIRE ELIOT J. B., SCHULTZ CHERYL B., CRONE ELIZABETH E., Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact : Designing a butterfly network, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01326.x
  49. Merckx Thomas, Van Dyck Hans, Mate location behaviour of the butterfly Pararge aegeria in woodland and fragmented landscapes, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.005
  50. Morales Juan Manuel, Ellner Stephen P., SCALING UP ANIMAL MOVEMENTS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEHAVIOR, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2240:suamih]2.0.co;2
  51. Morales Juan Manuel, Haydon Daniel T., Frair Jacqui, Holsinger Kent E., Fryxell John M., EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS, 10.1890/03-0269
  52. Morales J. M., Moorcroft P. R., Matthiopoulos J., Frair J. L., Kie J. G., Powell R. A., Merrill E. H., Haydon D. T., Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0082
  53. Neumann Wiebke, Martinuzzi Sebastian, Estes Anna B, Pidgeon Anna M, Dettki Holger, Ericsson Göran, Radeloff Volker C, Opportunities for the application of advanced remotely-sensed data in ecological studies of terrestrial animal movement, 10.1186/s40462-015-0036-7
  54. Nowicki Piotr, Vrabec Vladimir, Binzenhöfer Birgit, Feil Johann, Zakšek Barbara, Hovestadt Thomas, Settele Josef, Butterfly dispersal in inhospitable matrix: rare, risky, but long-distance, 10.1007/s10980-013-9971-0
  55. Ovaskainen Otso, Cornell Stephen J., Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes, 10.1017/s0021900200019562
  56. Ovaskainen Otso, Rekola Hanna, Meyke Evgeniy, Arjas Elja, BAYESIAN METHODS FOR ANALYZING MOVEMENTS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES FROM MARK–RECAPTURE DATA, 10.1890/07-0443.1
  57. PATTERSON T, THOMAS L, WILCOX C, OVASKAINEN O, MATTHIOPOULOS J, State–space models of individual animal movement, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009
  58. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (2016) PNHP species list—insects and spiders. http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/species.aspx
  59. Perry George L. W., Bond Nicholas R., Spatially explicit modeling of habitat dynamics and fish population persistence in an intermittent lowland stream, 10.1890/08-0651.1
  60. Prevedello Jayme Augusto, Vieira Marcus Vinícius, Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence, 10.1007/s10531-009-9750-z
  61. Reeve John D., Cronin James T., Haynes Kyle J., Diffusion models for animals in complex landscapes: incorporating heterogeneity among substrates, individuals and edge behaviours, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01411.x
  62. Revilla E., Wiegand T., Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations, 10.1073/pnas.0801725105
  63. Ricketts Taylor H., The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes, 10.1086/320863
  64. Ries Leslie, Debinski Diane M., Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa : Butterfly response to edges, 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00546.x
  65. Ross J. Andrew, Matter Stephen F., Roland Jens, Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat, 10.1007/s10980-004-1010-8
  66. Ruel Jonathan J., Ayres Matthew P., Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation, 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01664-x
  67. Schneider Christine, The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00495.x
  68. Schtickzelle Nicolas, Joiris Augustin, Van Dyck Hans, Baguette Michel, 10.1186/1471-2148-7-4
  69. Schultz Cheryl B., Dispersal Behavior and Its Implications for Reserve Design in a Rare Oregon Butterfly, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96266.x
  70. Schultz Cheryl B., Crone Elizabeth E., EDGE-MEDIATED DISPERSAL BEHAVIOR IN A PRAIRIE BUTTERFLY, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1879:emdbia]2.0.co;2
  71. Schultz Cheryl B., Franco Aldina M. A., Crone Elizabeth E., Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries : Butterfly movement at patch edges, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01947.x
  72. Severns Paul M., McIntire Eliot J. B., Schultz Cheryl B., Evaluating functional connectivity with matrix behavior uncertainty for an endangered butterfly, 10.1007/s10980-013-9860-6
  73. Siu Jenna C., Koscinski Daria, Keyghobadi Nusha, Swallowtail butterflies show positive edge responses predicted by resource use, 10.1007/s10980-016-0385-7
  74. SKELLAM J. G., RANDOM DISPERSAL IN THEORETICAL POPULATIONS, 10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.196
  75. Skórka Piotr, Nowicki Piotr, Lenda Magdalena, Witek Magdalena, Śliwińska Ewa B., Settele Josef, Woyciechowski Michal, Different flight behaviour of the endangered scarce large blue butterfly Phengaris teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within and outside its habitat patches, 10.1007/s10980-013-9855-3
  76. SPEAR STEPHEN F., BALKENHOL NIKO, FORTIN MARIE-JOSÉE, MCRAE BRAD H., SCRIBNER KIM, Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis : RESISTANCE SURFACES IN LANDSCAPE GENETICS, 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04657.x
  77. Stevens Virginie M., Polus Emmanuelle, Wesselingh Renate A., Schtickzelle Nicolas, Baguette Michel, Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita), 10.1007/s10980-004-0166-6
  78. Taylor Philip D., Fahrig Lenore, Henein Kringen, Merriam Gray, Connectivity Is a Vital Element of Landscape Structure, 10.2307/3544927
  79. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna
  80. Tischendorf Lutz, 10.1023/a:1011112719782
  81. Turchin Peter, Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers, 10.2307/1941099
  82. Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland
  83. Turlure Camille, Van Dyck Hans, Schtickzelle Nicolas, Baguette Michel, Resource-based habitat definition, niche overlap and conservation of two sympatric glacial relict butterflies, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17269.x
  84. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, New York
  85. Vanreusel Wouter, Van Dyck Hans, When functional habitat does not match vegetation types: A resource-based approach to map butterfly habitat, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.035
  86. White J. Wilson, Rassweiler Andrew, Samhouri Jameal F., Stier Adrian C., White Crow, Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01073.x
  87. Wiens J. A., Spatial Scaling in Ecology, 10.2307/2389612
  88. Wiens John A., Stenseth Nils Chr., Horne Beatrice Van, Ims Rolf Anker, Ecological Mechanisms and Landscape Ecology, 10.2307/3544931
  89. Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston
  90. Zeller Katherine A., McGarigal Kevin, Whiteley Andrew R., Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review, 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0
  91. Zeller Katherine A., McGarigal Kevin, Cushman Samuel A., Beier Paul, Vickers T. Winston, Boyce Walter M., Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: pumas as a case study, 10.1007/s10980-015-0301-6
  92. Zollner Patrick A., Lima Steven L., SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE-LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS, 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1019:ssflli]2.0.co;2
  93. Maciel Gabriel Andreguetto, Lutscher Frithjof, How Individual Movement Response to Habitat Edges Affects Population Persistence and Spatial Spread, 10.1086/670661
  94. Potts Jonathan R., Hillen Thomas, Lewis Mark A., The “edge effect” phenomenon: deriving population abundance patterns from individual animal movement decisions, 10.1007/s12080-015-0283-7
  95. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 72:533–545
Bibliographic reference Brown, Leone M. ; Fuda, Rebecca K. ; Schtickzelle, Nicolas ; Coffman ; Jost, Audrey ; et. al. Using animal movement behavior to categorize land cover and predict consequences for connectivity and patch residence times. In: Landscape Ecology, , p. 1-14 (2017)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/185959