User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize

Primary tabs

Devos, Yann Thas, Olivier Cougnon, Mathias De Clercq, Eva M. [UCL] Cordemans, Karl Reheul, Dirk

Using geographic information system datasets and Monte Carlo simulations, this study investigates to what extent the intra-regional variability in maize share and field distribution affects the feasibility of implementing isolation perimeters between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM maize fields. More specifically, five scenarios differing in shares and spatial distributions of GM maize were tested for various isolation perimeters in six agricultural areas in Flanders (Belgium). Proportions of non-GM maize fields and farmers having at least one non-GM maize field occurring within isolation perimeters were calculated to assess how spatial co-existence measures would affect the freedom of choice of neighbouring farmers to grow non-GM maize on their fields. Irrespective of the scenario tested, our results demonstrated that the proportions of non-GM maize fields and their corresponding farmers falling within the isolation perimeters are approximately two to eight times higher in areas with the highest maize share than in areas with the lowest maize share. The higher the share of GM maize and the wider the imposed isolation perimeter, the lower the intra-regional differences became. Hence, those findings confirm that farmers will not be equally affected by isolation perimeters, indicating the importance of considering intra-regional differences in the choice of appropriate spatial co-existence measures. Since uniform and wide isolation perimeters tend to be difficult to implement in practice and hardly reflect the diversity of the agricultural landscape, relying on flexible or combining various co-existence measures is worthwhile considering. As an alternative to single co-existence measures for limiting the GM input from cross-fertilisations between neighbouring maize fields, the appropriateness of other on-farm co-existence measures is discussed for Flemish agricultural conditions. Proposing the most appropriate co-existence measures on a case-by-case basis may be one step forward in reaching proportionate, fair and consistent co-existence at the regional and landscape level.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article)
Access type Accès interdit
Publication date 2008
Language Anglais
Journal information "Agronomy for Sustainable Development : sciences des productions vegetales et de l'environnement" - Vol. 28, no.2, p. 195-206 (2008)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer France (Paris)
issn 1774-0746
e-issn 1773-0155
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate
Links
  1. Aylor Donald E., Schultes Neil P., Shields Elson J., An aerobiological framework for assessing cross-pollination in maize, 10.1016/s0168-1923(03)00159-x
  2. Bannert Michael, Stamp Peter, Cross-pollination of maize at long distance, 10.1016/j.eja.2007.01.002
  3. De Schrijver A., Devos Y., Van den Bulcke M., Cadot P., De Loose M., Reheul D., Sneyers M., Risk assessment of GM stacked events obtained from crosses between GM events, 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.09.002
  4. Della Porta G., Ederle D., Bucchini L., Prandi M., Pozzi C., Verderio A. (2006) Gene flow between neighboring maize fields in the Po Valley: a fact-finding investigation regarding coexistence between conventional and non-conventional maize farming in the region of Lombardy, Italy. Report, Centro Documentazione Agrobiotechnologie, Milan, Italy.
  5. Demeke T., Perry D. J., Scowcroft W. R., Adventitious presence of GMOs: Scientific overview for Canadian grains, 10.4141/p05-114
  6. DEVAUX C., LAVIGNE C., AUSTERLITZ F., KLEIN E. K., Modelling and estimating pollen movement in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) at the landscape scale using genetic markers : LANDSCAPE OILSEED RAPE POLLINATION, 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03155.x
  7. Devos Yann, Reheul Dirk, Schrijver Adinda DE, Cors François, Moens William, Management of herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape in Europe: a case study on minimizing vertical gene flow, 10.1051/ebr:2005001
  8. Devos Yann, Reheul Dirk, De Schrijver Adinda, The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization, 10.1051/ebr:2005013
  9. Devos Yann, Reheul Dirk, De Waele Danny, Van Speybroeck Linda, The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union, 10.1051/ebr:2007002
  10. Devos Yann, Reheul Dirk, Thas Olivier, Clercq Eva M., Cougnon Mathias, Cordemans Karl, Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields, 10.1051/agro:2007005
  11. Dolezel M., Pascher K., Grabherr G. (2005) Regionally as a key parameter for co-existence of genetically modified maize with conventional and organic maize, in: Messéan A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Co-existence between GM and non-GM based agricultural supply chains, Agropolis Productions, Montpellier, pp. 203–206.
  12. EC (2003a) Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, Official J. European Comm. L189, 36–47.
  13. EC (2003b) Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, Official J. European Comm. L268, 1–23.
  14. EC (2006) Report on the implementation of national measures on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming.
  15. Friesen Lyle F., Nelson Alison G., Van Acker Rene C., EVIDENCE OF CONTAMINATION OF PEDIGREED CANOLA () SEEDLOTS IN WESTERN CANADA WITH GENETICALLY ENGINEERED HERBICIDE RESISTANCE TRAITS, 10.2134/agronj2003.1342
  16. Gustafson D. I., Brants I. O., Horak M. J., Remund K. M., Rosenbaum E. W., Soteres J. K., Empirical Modeling of Genetically Modified Maize Grain Production Practices to Achieve European Union Labeling Thresholds, 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0060
  17. Holst-Jensen Arne, De Loose Marc, Van den Eede Guy, Coherence between Legal Requirements and Approaches for Detection of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Their Derived Products, 10.1021/jf052849a
  18. Jarosz Nathalie, Loubet Benjamin, Durand Brigitte, Foueillassar Xavier, Huber Laurent, Variations in Maize Pollen Emission and Deposition in Relation to Microclimate, 10.1021/es0494252
  19. Kuparinen Anna, Schurr Frank, Tackenberg Oliver, O'Hara Robert B., AIR-MEDIATED POLLEN FLOW FROM GENETICALLY MODIFIED TO CONVENTIONAL CROPS, 10.1890/05-1599
  20. Lutman P. J.W, Berry K., Payne R. W, Simpson E., Sweet J. B, Champion G. T, May M. J, Wightman P., Walker K., Lainsbury M., Persistence of seeds from crops of conventional and herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus), 10.1098/rspb.2005.3166
  21. Marvier Michelle, Acker Rene C. Van, Can Crop Transgenes Be Kept on a Leash?, 10.2307/3868516
  22. Messéan A., Angevin F., Gómez-Barbero M., Menrad K., Rodríguez-Cerezo E. (2006) New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Report, Joint Research Centre and Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain.
  23. Messéan A., Sausse C., Gasquez J., Darmency H., Occurrence of genetically modified oilseed rape seeds in the harvest of subsequent conventional oilseed rape over time, 10.1016/j.eja.2007.02.009
  24. Messeguer Joaquima, Peñas Gisela, Ballester Jordi, Bas Marta, Serra Joan, Salvia Jordi, Palaudelmàs Montserrat, Melé Enric, Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize in real situations of coexistence, 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00207.x
  25. Pla Maria, Paz José-Luis La, Peñas Gisela, García Nora, Palaudelmàs Montserrat, Esteve Teresa, Messeguer Joaquima, Melé Enric, Assessment of Real-time PCR Based Methods for Quantification of Pollen-mediated Gene Flow from GM to Conventional Maize in a Field Study, 10.1007/s11248-005-4945-x
  26. Sanvido O., Widmer F., Winzeler M., Streit B., Szerencsits E., Bigler F. (in press) Definition and feasibility of isolation distance for transgenic maize, Transgenic Res., doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9103-1.
  27. Schiemann Joachim, Editorial. Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, 10.1051/ebr:2003017
  28. Van De Wiel C.C.M., Lotz L.A.P. (2006) Outcrossing and coexistence of genetically modified with (genetically) unmodified crops: a case study of the situation in the Netherlands, Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 54, 17–35.
  29. Weber W.E., Bringezu T., Pohl M., Gerstenkorn D. (2006) Bt maize — farmers and grain trade implement coexistence, Mais 2, 2–4.
  30. Weber W. E., Bringezu T., Broer I., Eder J., Holz F., Coexistence Between GM and Non-GM Maize Crops ? Tested in 2004 at the Field Scale Level (Erprobungsanbau 2004), 10.1111/j.1439-037x.2006.00245.x
  31. Weekes Rebecca, Allnutt Theodore, Boffey Caroline, Morgan Sarah, Bilton Mark, Daniels Roger, Henry Christine, A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK, 10.1007/s11248-006-9036-0
  32. Yoshimura Yasuyuki, Beckie Hugh J., Matsuo Kazuhito, Transgenic oilseed rape along transportation routes and port of Vancouver in western Canada, 10.1051/ebr:2006019
Bibliographic reference Devos, Yann ; Thas, Olivier ; Cougnon, Mathias ; De Clercq, Eva M. ; Cordemans, Karl ; et. al. Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize. In: Agronomy for Sustainable Development : sciences des productions vegetales et de l'environnement, Vol. 28, no.2, p. 195-206 (2008)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/181658