User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers' Decision-Making

Primary tabs

download
  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 420.45 K
Lamarque, Pénélope Meyfroidt, Patrick [UCL] Nettier, Baptiste Lavorel, Sandra
Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès libre
Publication date 2014
Language Anglais
Journal information "PLoS One" - Vol. 9, no.9, p. e107572 (2014)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Public Library of Science
issn 1932-6203
e-issn 1932-6203
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate
Links
  1. Lamarque Pénélope, Quétier Fabien, Lavorel Sandra, The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management, 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.007
  2. Foley J. A., Global Consequences of Land Use, 10.1126/science.1111772
  3. Diaz S., Quetier F., Caceres D. M., Trainor S. F., Perez-Harguindeguy N., Bret-Harte M. S., Finegan B., Pena-Claros M., Poorter L., Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society, 10.1073/pnas.1017993108
  4. Liu Jianguo, Dietz Thomas, Carpenter Stephen R., Folke Carl, Alberti Marina, Redman Charles L., Schneider Stephen H., Ostrom Elinor, Pell Alice N., Lubchenco Jane, Taylor William W., Ouyang Zhiyun, Deadman Peter, Kratz Timothy, Provencher William, Coupled Human and Natural Systems, 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:chans]2.0.co;2
  5. Meyfroidt Patrick, Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview, 10.1080/1747423x.2012.667452
  6. Mace GM, Bateman I, (ed.) (2011) Conceptual Framework and Methodology. In: The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  7. Hein Lars, van Koppen Kris, de Groot Rudolf S., van Ierland Ekko C., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
  8. Reyers Belinda, Biggs Reinette, Cumming Graeme S, Elmqvist Thomas, Hejnowicz Adam P, Polasky Stephen, Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach, 10.1890/120144
  9. Banerjee Simanti, Secchi Silvia, Fargione Joseph, Polasky Stephen, Kraft Steven, How to sell ecosystem services: a guide for designing new markets, 10.1890/120044
  10. Robertson Morgan, BenDor Todd K, Lave Rebecca, Riggsbee Adam, Ruhl JB, Doyle Martin, Stacking ecosystem services, 10.1890/110292
  11. Costanza Robert, d'Arge Ralph, de Groot Rudolf, Farber Stephen, Grasso Monica, Hannon Bruce, Limburg Karin, Naeem Shahid, O'Neill Robert V., Paruelo Jose, Raskin Robert G., Sutton Paul, van den Belt Marjan, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, 10.1038/387253a0
  12. TEEB (2009) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Policy Makers Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature. Available at: www.teebweb.org, accessed 10 june 2010.
  13. von Haaren Christina, Albert Christian, Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies, 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534
  14. J Salzman, Stan Envtl, 20, 309 (2001)
  15. St John Freya A. V., Edwards-Jones Gareth, Jones Julia P. G., Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology, 10.1071/wr10032
  16. Kumar Manasi, Kumar Pushpam, Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008
  17. Jones Natalie A., Ross Helen, Lynam Timothy, Perez Pascal, Leitch Anne, Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods, 10.5751/es-03802-160146
  18. Wise R.M., Fazey I., Stafford Smith M., Park S.E., Eakin H.C., Archer Van Garderen E.R.M., Campbell B., Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
  19. Ajzen Icek, The theory of planned behavior, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  20. PC Stern, Human ecology review, 6, 81 (1999)
  21. O’Farrell P.J., Donaldson J.S., Hoffman M.T., The influence of ecosystem goods and services on livestock management practices on the Bokkeveld plateau, South Africa, 10.1016/j.agee.2007.01.025
  22. Lewan Lillemor, Söderqvist Tore, Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden, 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00127-1
  23. Lamarque Pénélope, Tappeiner Ulrike, Turner Catherine, Steinbacher Melanie, Bardgett Richard D., Szukics Ute, Schermer Markus, Lavorel Sandra, Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity, 10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0
  24. CM Fontaine, Journal of Land Use Science, 1 (2013)
  25. Duguma Lalisa Alemayehu, Hager Herbert, Farmers’ Assessment of the Social and Ecological Values of Land Uses in Central Highland Ethiopia, 10.1007/s00267-011-9657-9
  26. Martín-López Berta, Iniesta-Arandia Irene, García-Llorente Marina, Palomo Ignacio, Casado-Arzuaga Izaskun, Amo David García Del, Gómez-Baggethun Erik, Oteros-Rozas Elisa, Palacios-Agundez Igone, Willaarts Bárbara, González José A., Santos-Martín Fernando, Onaindia Miren, López-Santiago Cesar, Montes Carlos, Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
  27. Nettier B, Dobremez L, Seres C, Pauthenet Y, Orsini M, et al. (2011) Biodiversity conservation by livestock farmers: advantages and shortcomings of the agri-environmental scheme 'Prairies fleuries'. Fourrages: 283–292.
  28. Feola Giuseppe, Binder Claudia R., Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.023
  29. Tengö Maria, Belfrage Kristina, Local Management Practices for Dealing with Change and Uncertainty: A Cross-scale Comparison of Cases in Sweden and Tanzania, 10.5751/es-00672-090304
  30. Lauer Matthew, Aswani Shankar, Indigenous Knowledge and Long-term Ecological Change: Detection, Interpretation, and Responses to Changing Ecological Conditions in Pacific Island Communities, 10.1007/s00267-010-9471-9
  31. Meyfroidt Patrick, Environmental Cognitions, Land Change and Social-Ecological Feedbacks: Local Case Studies of Forest Transition in Vietnam, 10.1007/s10745-012-9560-x
  32. Poppenborg Patrick, Koellner Thomas, Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practices? An analysis of farmers’ decision-making in a South Korean watershed, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.007
  33. Quétier (2006) Vulnérabilité des écosystèmes semi-naturels européens aux changements d'utilisations des terres. Montpellier: Ecole supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier. 269 p.
  34. B Nettier, Revue De Geographie Alpine-Journal of Alpine Research, 98, 383 (2010)
  35. Lamarque Pénélope, Artaux Aloïs, Barnaud Cécile, Dobremez Laurent, Nettier Baptiste, Lavorel Sandra, Taking into account farmers’ decision making to map fine-scale land management adaptation to climate and socio-economic scenarios, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.012
  36. Vignola Raffaele, Koellner Thomas, Scholz Roland W., McDaniels Tim L., Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: Factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.003
  37. Dietz Thomas, Fitzgerald Amy, Shwom Rachael, ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444
  38. GEIST HELMUT J., LAMBIN ERIC F., Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2
  39. Svarstad Hanne, Petersen Lars Kjerulf, Rothman Dale, Siepel Henk, Wätzold Frank, Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.005
  40. Fisher Brendan, Turner R. Kerry, Morling Paul, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
  41. Girel J, Quétier F, Bignon A, Aubert S (2010) Histoire de l'agriculture en Oisans. Hautes Romanche et pays faranchin. Villar d'Arène, Hautes-Alpes (History of agriculture in Oisans. Villar d'Arène, Hautes-Alpes). Grenoble, France: Station Alpine Joseph Fourier. 79 p.
  42. Quétier Fabien, Thébault Aurélie, Lavorel Sandra, PLANT TRAITS IN A STATE AND TRANSITION FRAMEWORK AS MARKERS OF ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE TO LAND-USE CHANGE, 10.1890/06-0054
  43. Diaz S., Lavorel S., de Bello F., Quetier F., Grigulis K., Robson T. M., Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments, 10.1073/pnas.0704716104
  44. Quétier Fabien, Rivoal Florian, Marty Pascal, de Chazal Jacqueline, Thuiller Wilfried, Lavorel Sandra, Social representations of an alpine grassland landscape and socio-political discourses on rural development, 10.1007/s10113-009-0099-3
  45. Deboeuf E (2009) Adaptabilité des systèmes d'élevage de haute-montagne à des aléas. Le cas de Villar d'Arène: Enita de Clermont-Ferrand, France. 91 p.
  46. Fleury Ph., Dubeuf Brigitte, Jeannin B., Forage management in dairy farms: A methodological approach, 10.1016/0308-521x(96)00008-x
  47. George AL, Bennett A (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  48. Lugnot M., Martin G., Biodiversity provides ecosystem services: scientific results versus stakeholders’ knowledge, 10.1007/s10113-013-0426-6
  49. Vatn Arild, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
  50. Mottet Anne, Ladet Sylvie, Coqué Nathalie, Gibon Annick, Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.017
  51. von Glasenapp Markus, Thornton Thomas F., Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Swiss Alpine Farmers and their Resilience to Socioecological Change, 10.1007/s10745-011-9427-6
  52. Edwards-Jones G., Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges, 10.1017/asc2006112
  53. Kaiser Florian G., Hubner Gundula, Bogner Franz X., Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value-Belief-Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior1, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x
  54. Voinov Alexey, Bousquet Francois, Modelling with stakeholders☆, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
  55. Etienne Mc (2010) La modélisation d'accompagnement: Une démarche participative en appui au développement durable. Versailles, France: Quae Editions. 368 p.
  56. JW Termorshuizen, 24, 1037 (2009)
  57. Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Raffaelli DG, Frid CLJ (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being Ecology E, editor: Cambridge University Press.
  58. TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar. Earthscan, London and Washington.
  59. Barnaud Cécile, Antona Martine, Marzin Jacques, Vers une mise en débat des incertitudes associées à la notion de service écosystémique, 10.4000/vertigo.10905
  60. Vihervaara Petteri, Rönkä Mia, Walls Mari, Trends in Ecosystem Service Research: Early Steps and Current Drivers, 10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x
  61. Lamarque P., Lavorel S., Mouchet M., Quetier F., Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services, 10.1073/pnas.1216051111
  62. Lavorel Sandra, Grigulis Karl, Lamarque Pénélope, Colace Marie-Pascale, Garden Denys, Girel Jacky, Pellet Gilles, Douzet Rolland, Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services : Plant functional traits and provision of multiple ecosystem services, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x
Bibliographic reference Lamarque, Pénélope ; Meyfroidt, Patrick ; Nettier, Baptiste ; Lavorel, Sandra. How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers' Decision-Making. In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, no.9, p. e107572 (2014)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/153355